Paradoxes

Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A paradox can be defined as an unacceptable conclusion derived by apparently acceptable reasoning from apparently acceptable premises. Many paradoxes raise serious philosophical problems, and they are associated with crises of thought and revolutionary advances. The expanded and revised third edition of this intriguing book considers a range of knotty paradoxes including Zeno's paradoxical claim that the runner can never overtake the tortoise, a new chapter on paradoxes about morals, paradoxes about belief, and hardest of all, paradoxes about truth. The discussion uses a minimum of technicality but also grapples with complicated and difficult considerations, and is accompanied by helpful questions designed to engage the reader with the arguments. The result is not only an explanation of paradoxes but also an excellent introduction to philosophical thinking.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paradoxes.Roy T. Cook - 2013 - Malden, MA: Polity.
How hard are the sceptical paradoxes?Alex Byrne - 2004 - Noûs 38 (2):299–325.
Paradoxes of intensionality.Dustin Tucker & Richmond H. Thomason - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):394-411.
An Order-Theoretic Account of Some Set-Theoretic Paradoxes.Thomas Forster & Thierry Libert - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):1-19.
10 Moral Paradoxes.Saul Smilansky (ed.) - 2007 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Paradoxes From a to Z.Michael Clark - 2002 - New York: Routledge.
Definability and the Structure of Logical Paradoxes.Haixia Zhong - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):779 - 788.
10 Moral Paradoxes.Saul Smilansky - 2007 - Malden, MA: Blackwell.
What the liar taught Achilles.Gary Mar & Paul St Denis - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):29-46.
A Wittgensteinian Way with Paradoxes.Rupert J. Read - 2012 - Lanham, MD, USA: Lexington Books.
Logical paradoxes.Barry Hartley Slater - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
139 (#128,277)

6 months
23 (#110,193)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Sainsbury
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

Sorites paradox.Dominic Hyde - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hempel's Raven paradox: A lacuna in the standard bayesian solution.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (3):545-560.
Fitch's proof, verificationism, and the knower paradox.J. C. Beall - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2):241 – 247.
Analetheism and dialetheism.J. Beall & D. Ripley - 2004 - Analysis 64 (1):30-35.

View all 46 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references