David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):84-88 (2013)
Visual recording of human subjects is commonly used in biomedical disciplines for clinical, research, legal, academic and even personal purposes. Guidelines on practice standards of biomedical recording have been issued by certain health authorities, associations and journals, but none of the literature discusses this from an Islamic perspective. This article begins with a discussion on the general rules associated with visual recording in Islam, followed by modesty issues in biomedical recording and issues of informed consent and confidentiality. In order to be deemed ethical from the Islamic perspective, all the aforementioned criteria must conform to, or not contradict, Islamic teaching
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
M. Quigley (2007). Non-Human Primates: The Appropriate Subjects of Biomedical Research? Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (11):655-658.
R. R. Kishore (2006). Biomedical Research and Mining of the Poor: The Need for Their Exclusion. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):175-183.
Farrokh B. Sekaleshfar (2010). A Critique of Islamic Arguments on Human Cloning. Zygon 45 (1):37-46.
Aurora Plomer (2005). The Law and Ethics of Medical Research: International Bioethics and Human Rights. Cavendish.
Douglas Peddicor (2010). Financial Conflicts of Interest in Research with Human Subjects : A Clinical Research Organization's Perspective. In Thomas H. Murray & Josephine Johnston (eds.), Trust and Integrity in Biomedical Research: The Case of Financial Conflicts of Interest. Johns Hopkins University Press. 241.
Philippe Amiel, Sverine Mathieu & Anne Fagot-Largeault (2001). Acculturating Human Experimentation: An Empirical Survey in France. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):285 – 298.
Peter H. Van Ness (2001). The Concept of Risk in Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Bioethics 15 (4):364–370.
Charles Weijer, The Ethical Analysis of Risks and Potential Benefits in Human Subjects Research: History, Theory, and Implications for U.S. Regulation.
C. G. Foster (1994). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (2):123-124.
H. Nederbragt (2000). The Biomedical Disciplines and the Structure of Biomedical and Clinical Knowledge. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (6):553-566.
Amy Bruckman (2002). Studying the Amateur Artist: A Perspective on Disguising Data Collected in Human Subjects Research on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):217-231.
Greg A. Sachs & Christine K. Cassel (1990). Biomedical Research Involving Older Human Subjects. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 18 (3):234-243.
Mohammed Ghaly (2010). Human Cloning Through the Eyes of Muslim Scholars: The New Phenomenon of the Islamic International Religioscientific Institutions. Zygon 45 (1):7-35.
Added to index2012-10-05
Total downloads10 ( #148,640 of 1,102,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,435 of 1,102,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?