Graduate studies at Western
Ancient Philosophy 29 (2):311-335 (2009)
|Abstract||The Nicomachean Ethics is generally thought to be a “dialectical” work, aimed at resolving aporia in a set of endoxa, which it takes as its starting-point. I argue that Aristotle’s aim in the treatise is, rather, to produce definitions of key ethical terms, and that his starting-points are limited to evaluative and discriminative judgments of a certain sort, which are demanded by the nature of the discipline and are not endoxa. I discuss also how the definitions are reached (focusing on the cases of the virtues of character) and the roles that aporiai do play in the process.|
|Keywords||Aristotle Ethics Methodology dialectic aporia endoxa definitions|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Vijay Mascarenhas (2010). God and the Good in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Epoché 15 (1):35-59.
Jon Miller (ed.) (2011). Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Aristotle (2006). Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Aristotle (2006/1998). Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.
Todd S. Mei (2009). The Preeminence of Use: Reevaluating the Relation Between Use and Exchange in Aristotle's Economic Thought. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 523-548.
Nicholas O. Pagan (2008). Configuring the Moral Self: Aristotle and Dewey. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 13 (3-4):239-250.
Luis Vega Renon (1998). Aristotle's Endoxa and Plausible Argumentation. Argumentation 12 (1):95-113.
Added to index2009-09-01
Total downloads83 ( #11,233 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,222 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?