Philosophy of Science 64 (3):461-477 (1997)
|Abstract||This paper discusses several distinct process theories of causality offered in recent years by Phil Dowe and me. It addresses problems concerning the explication of causal process, causal interaction, and causal transmission, whether given in terms of transmission of marks, transmission of invariant or conserved quantities, or mere possession of conserved quantities. Renouncing the mark-transmission and invariant quantity criteria, I accept a conserved quantity theory similar to Dowe's--differing basically with respect to causal transmission. This paper also responds to several fundamental constructive criticisms contained in Christopher Hitchcock's discussion of both the mark-transmission and the conserved quantity theories|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Phil Dowe (2000). The Conserved Quantity Theory Defended. Theoria 15 (1):11-31.
Phil Dowe (2004). Causation and Misconnections. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):926-931.
Sungho Choi (2003). The Conserved Quantity Theory of Causation and Closed Systems. Philosophy of Science 70 (3):510-530.
Phil Dowe (2000). Physical Causation. Cambridge University Press.
Phil Dowe (1992). Wesley Salmon's Process Theory of Causality and the Conserved Quantity Theory. Philosophy of Science 59 (2):195-216.
Anton Froeyman (2012). The Ontology of Causal Process Theories. Philosophia 40 (3):523-538.
Phil Dowe (1992). An Empiricist Defence of the Causal Account of Explanation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (2):123 – 128.
Max Kistler (1998). Reducing Causality to Transmission. Erkenntnis 48 (1):1-25.
Phil Dowe (1995). Causality and Conserved Quantities: A Reply to Salmon. Philosophy of Science 62 (2):321-333.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads67 ( #13,246 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?