Comparisons between scholastic logical tools and modern formal logic (1937)
Axiomathes 4 (2) (1993)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGraham Priest (2000). Logic: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Jan Woleński (2003). Polish Attempts to Modernize Thomism by Logic (Bocheński and Salamucha). Studies in East European Thought 55 (4):299-313.
Uwe Petersen (2002). Diagonal Method and Dialectical Logic: Tools, Materials, and Groundworks for a Logical Foundation of Dialectic and Speculative Philosophy. Der Andere Verlag.
Colwyn Williamson (1972). Squares of Opposition: Comparisons Between Syllogistic and Propositional Logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13 (4):497-500.
J. P. Cleave (1991). A Study of Logics. Oxford University Press.
Barry Smith & David Murray (1981). Logic, Form and Matter. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 55:47 - 74.
Richard Bornat (2005). Proof and Disproof in Formal Logic: An Introduction for Programmers. New Yorkoxford University Press.
Philotheus Boehner (1952). Medieval Logic. [Manchester, Eng.]Manchester University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,458 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
