Genealogy (and the relationship between opposite-sex/same-sex sibling pairs) is what kinship is all about

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (5):401-402 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What are the theoretical implications of a universal genealogy? After the demise of relativism in kinship studies, there is much to be gained by joining old formal-structural analysis of kinship to recent cognitive-evolutionary approaches. This commentary shows how the logic of kinship terminologies, specifically those of the Seneca-Iroquois, can be clarified by looking at the relationship between opposite-sex/same-sex sibling pairs

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Asymmetries In Value.Thomas Hurka - 2010 - Noûs 44 (2):199-223.
"The Servant Problem" and Justice in Households.Joan Tronto - 2010 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 2 (3):67-85.
Kinship terms are not kinship.Maurice Bloch - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (5):384-384.
Strange Kinship.Kelly Oliver - 2008 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):101-120.
Genealogy as critique?Tyler Krupp - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):315-337.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
35 (#445,257)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations