How not to become a millian heir
Philosophical Studies 62 (2):165 - 177 (1991)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKaren Green (1999). Was Wittgenstein Frege's Heir? Philosophical Quarterly 50 (196):289-308.
Joseph P. Fitzpatrick (1937). Lenin, Heir of Marx. Thought 12 (2):211-224.
David Kaplan (1967). Transworld Heir Lines. In Michael J. Loux (ed.), The Possible and the Actual. Cornell University Press.
Bryan Frances (1998). Defending Millian Theories. Mind 107 (428):703-728.
Jonathan Riley (2006). Liberal Rights in a Pareto-Optimal Code. Utilitas 18 (1):61-79.
Ben Caplan (2007). Millian Descriptivism. Philosophical Studies 133 (2):181-198.
Nathan Salmon (1990). A Millian Heir Rejects the Wages of Sinn. In C. A. Anderson & J. Owens (eds.), Propositional Attitudes: The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind. Csli Publications.
Nathan Salmon (1989). Symposiums Papers: How to Become a Millian Heir. Noûs 23 (2):211-220.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads29 ( #42,467 of 551,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 551,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
