Institutional constraints on the ethics of expert testimony

Ethics and Behavior 3 (3 & 4):231 – 249 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We examined the dilemmas posed by the involvement of expert witnesses in court cases and the institutional constraints on the ethics of expert testimony. The causes for the incorporation of bad science into legal decisions, potential solutions to this dilemma, and the limitations of these solutions are considered. We concluded that law, science, and experts must respond to the problems posed by expert witnessing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#369,691)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Professionalism in Forensic Bioethics.Bethany J. Speilman - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (3):420-439.
Professionalism in Forensic Bioethics.Bethany J. Spielman - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (3):420-439.
Professionalism in Forensic Bioethics.Bethany J. Speilman - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (3):420-439.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references