Institutional constraints on the ethics of expert testimony

Ethics and Behavior 3 (3 & 4):231 – 249 (1993)
We examined the dilemmas posed by the involvement of expert witnesses in court cases and the institutional constraints on the ethics of expert testimony. The causes for the incorporation of bad science into legal decisions, potential solutions to this dilemma, and the limitations of these solutions are considered. We concluded that law, science, and experts must respond to the problems posed by expert witnessing.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/s15327019eb0303&4_2
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Bethany J. Speilman (2002). Professionalism in Forensic Bioethics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 30 (3):420-439.
Bethany J. Speilman (2002). Professionalism in Forensic Bioethics. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (3):420-439.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

12 ( #355,740 of 1,926,184 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #453,420 of 1,926,184 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.