David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Proceedings of the Conference on Semantic Technology in Intelligence, Defense and Security (STIDS). CEUR, Vol. 808 (2011)
We describe a strategy for integration of data that is based on the idea of semantic enhancement. The strategy promises a number of benefits: it can be applied incrementally; it creates minimal barriers to the incorporation of new data into the semantically enhanced system; it preserves the existing data (including any existing data-semantics) in their original form (thus all provenance information is retained, and no heavy preprocessing is required); and it embraces the full spectrum of data sources, types, models, and modalities (including text, images, audio, and signals). The result of applying this strategy to a given body of data is an evolving Dataspace that allows the application of a variety of integration and analytic processes to diverse data contents. We conceive semantic enhancement (SE) as a lightweight and flexible process that leverages the richness of the structured contents of the Dataspace without adding storage and processing burdens to what, in the intelligence domain, will be an already storage- and processing-heavy starting point. SE works not by changing the data to which it is applied, but rather by adding an extra semantic layer to this data. We sketch how the semantic enhancement approach can be applied consistently and in cumulative fashion to new data and data-models that enter the Dataspace.
|Keywords||military ontology semantic web computer reasoning|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jan van Bakel (1984). Automatic Semantic Interpretation: A Computer Model of Understanding Natural Language. Foris Publications.
Graeme Hirst (1987). Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity. Cambridge University Press.
Barry Smith, Michael Ashburner, Cornelius Rosse, Jonathan Bard, William Bug, Werner Ceusters, Louis J. Goldberg, Karen Eilbeck, Amelia Ireland, Mungall Christopher J., Neocles Leontis & et al (2007). The OBO Foundry: Coordinated Evolution of Ontologies to Support Biomedical Data Integration. Nature Biotechnology 25 (11):1251-1255.
Luciano Floridi (2005). Is Semantic Information Meaningful Data? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):351-370.
Paolo Bouquet, Heiko Stoermer & Massimiliano Vignolo (2012). Web of Data and Web of Entities: Identity and Reference in Interlinked Data in the Semantic Web. Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):5-26.
Todd Harris (2003). Data Models and the Acquisition and Manipulation of Data. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1508-1517.
Mark A. Sabbagh & Benjamin A. Clegg (1999). Some Costs of Over-Assimilating Data to the Implicit/Explicit Distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):783-784.
Hsiang‐Ke Chao (2005). A Misconception of the Semantic Conception of Econometrics? Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (1):125-135.
Jan Doroszewski (1988). Ethical and Methodological Aspects of Medical Computer Data Bases and Knowledge Bases. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 9 (2).
Geoff Barnbrook, Pernilla Danielsson & Michaela Mahlberg (eds.) (2006). Meaningful Texts: The Extraction of Semantic Information From Monolingual and Multilingual Corpora. Continuum.
Steven Jones (2010). Using Web Data to Explore Lexico-Semantic Relations. In Petra Storjohann (ed.), Lexical-Semantic Relations: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. John Benjamins Pub. Company. 28--49.
Giuseppe Primiero (2013). Offline and Online Data: On Upgrading Functional Information to Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 164 (2):371-392.
Added to index2012-09-22
Total downloads21 ( #68,736 of 1,089,047 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #12,167 of 1,089,047 )
How can I increase my downloads?