David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 11 (1):203-228 (1996)
Logicians treat assertions as true, believed or merely hypothesized sentences. The reasoner who uses them, however, is the sole referee who can validate their truth, their aptness to describe an actual situation, their strength (as beliefs) or the relevance of their use in the current logical context. Moreover, the reasoner actively counts on these factors, as part of the reasoning process itself, and should normally be capable, when asked to do so, to assign consistently relative strengths to the assertions used. The paper assumes, first, that assertions have -each- an associated, measurable strength, and that, second, this strength has significant -and measurable- effects on the truth of the sentences, the validity of the conclusion and the soundness of the reasoning. The concepts and formulas required for this are explored, and a semantics and proof theory for a sentential calculus of assertions are proposed as a natural extension of ordinary two-valued reasoning. The resulting theory, though reminiscent of Probability,is autonomous, self-contained and of a purely logical nature
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stephen Donaho (1998). Are Declarative Sentences Representational? Mind 107 (425):33-58.
J. Ellenberg & E. Sober (2011). Objective Probabilities in Number Theory. Philosophia Mathematica 19 (3):308-322.
Stephen E. Newstead (1997). Conditional Reasoning with Realistic Material. Thinking and Reasoning 3 (1):49 – 76.
Peter Milne (2004). Algebras of Intervals and a Logic of Conditional Assertions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (5):497-548.
Ingvar Johansson (2003). Performatives and Antiperformatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (6):661-702.
Raymond S. Nickerson & Susan F. Butler (2008). Efficiency in Data Gathering: Set Size Effects in the Selection Task. Thinking and Reasoning 14 (1):60 – 82.
John W. Carroll (2005). Boundary in Context. Acta Analytica 20 (1):43-54.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). Assertions in Literary Fiction. Minerva 13:144-180.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?