David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 97 (2):249 - 267 (1993)
In 1981, A. C. Crombie identified six “styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition” that constitute our ways of reasoning in the natural sciences. In this paper, I try to show that these styles constitute reasoning in the social sciences as well, and that, as a result, the differences between reasoning about the physical world and about human beings are not so different as some interpretevists have supposed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Maria Alvarez (2010). Reasons for Action and Practical Reasoning. Ratio 23 (4):355-373.
James B. Freeman (2007). Arguments About Arguments. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4):525-540.
Brian Fay (2006). For Science in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):227-240.
Laurent Stern (2005). Interpretive Reasoning. Cornell University Press.
Gary L. Brase (2001). Markers of Social Group Membership as Probabilistic Cues in Reasoning Tasks. Thinking and Reasoning 7 (4):313 – 346.
Joachim I. Krueger (2007). The Flight From Reasoning in Psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):32-33.
Earl Hunt (2000). Situational Constraints on Normative Reasoning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):680-680.
Mieke Boon (2011). Two Styles of Reasoning in Scientific Practices: Experimental and Mathematical Traditions. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):255 - 278.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #51,469 of 1,004,641 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,617 of 1,004,641 )
How can I increase my downloads?