Two Models of Figural Historiography

Newman Studies Journal 7 (2):18-28 (2010)
This essay investigates the problem of reconciling contingent historical facts and immutable dogma in light of two different models of figural historiography, presented respectively in John Henry Newman’s Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine and Henri de Lubac’s Catholicism: A Study of Dogma in Relation to the Corporate Destiny of Mankind. Although Newman and de Lubac’s approaches to history were quite different, they are fundamentally complementary.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/nsj20107213
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,879
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
John R. White (2011). St. Bonaventure and the Problem of Doctrinal Development. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):177-202.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

4 ( #405,090 of 1,725,259 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #167,147 of 1,725,259 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.