David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):295-315 (2009)
In this paper I argue that Aquinas’s doctrine of analogy must be understood against the background of his overall philosophy of being. I suggest that Thomas’s oscillation between an analogy of attribution and proper proportionality should be understood as an attempt to address analogy from two different, albeit complementary, metaphysical perspectives. If created being is, as Thomas maintains, a composition of essence and existential act, then it would seem that the analogy of being would bear out the implications of the composite character of being. Thus, if Thomas’s analogy sometimes focuses on formal causality and at other times upon the communication of act via efficient causality, it is not because he adopts a new doctrine of being that supplants his earlier teaching but because of the twofold character of created being
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Derek J. Morrow (2006). Aquinas, Marion, Analogy, and Esse. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):25-42.
Victor Salas (2008). The Judmental Character of Thomas Aquinas's Analogy of Being. The Modern Schoolman 85 (2):117-142.
Antonio Donato (2003). The Role of Focus in Aquinas's Doctrine of Analogy. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:289-301.
Steven A. Long (2011). Analogia Entis: On the Analogy of Being, Metaphysics, and the Act of Faith. University of Notre Dame Press.
Thomas Joseph White (2010). Through Him All Things Were Made" (John 1:3) : The Analogy of the Word Incarnate According to St. Thomas Aquinas and its Ontological Presuppositions. [REVIEW] In , The Analogy of Being: Invention of the Antichrist or the Wisdom of God? W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
Joshua P. Hochschild (2005). The Rest of Cajetan's Analogy Theory. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):341-356.
Roger M. White (2009). Talking About God: The Concept of Analogy and the Problem of Religious Language. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
George Peter Klubertanz (1960). St. Thomas Aquinas on Analogy. Chicago, Loyola University Press.
John P. O'Callaghan (2002). Aquinas, Cognitive Theory, and Analogy. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):451-482.
Joshua P. Hochschild (2003). Did Aquinas Answer Cajetan's Question? Aquinas's Semantic Rules for Analogy and the Interpretation of De Nominum Analogia. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:273-288.
Joshua P. Hochschild (2010). The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan's De Nominum Analogia. University of Notre Dame Press.
Anthony Kenny (1980). Aquinas. Hill and Wang.
Anthony Kenny (1969). Aquinas. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Reinhard Hütter (2010). Attending the the Wisdom of God, From Effect to Cause, From Creation to God : A "Relecture" of the Analogy of Being According to Thomas Aquinas. In Thomas Joseph White (ed.), The Analogy of Being: Invention of the Antichrist or the Wisdom of God? W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
Petr Dvořák (2006). Some Thomists on Analogy. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (1):28-36.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads8 ( #138,593 of 1,088,854 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,854 )
How can I increase my downloads?