Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):209 - 236 (1976)
|Abstract||Chomsky has constructed an empirical theory about syntactic universals of natural language by defining a class of possible languages which includes all natural languages (inter alia) as members, and claiming that all natural languages fall within a specified proper subset of that class. I extend Chomsky's work to produce an empirical theory about natural-language semantic universals by showing that the semantc description of a language will incorporate a logical calculus, by defining a relatively wide class of possible calculi, and by specifying a proper subset of that class which, I hypothesize, includes the calculi needed for the semantic description of any natural language. I argue that the special status, with respect to natural languages, of this particular type of logical calculus is an empirical finding which does not follow from any independently-known principles, and I conclude that the question why the laws of human thought have the structure they do is a biological rather than a logical question.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eduardo García-Ramírez & Marilyn Shatz (2011). On Problems with Descriptivism: Psychological Assumptions and Empirical Evidence. Mind and Language 26 (1):53-77.
Christopher D. Viger (2005). Learning to Think: A Response to the Language of Thought Argument for Innateness. Mind and Language 20 (3):313-25.
William J. Rapaport (1988). Syntactic Semantics: Foundations of Computational Natural Language Understanding. In James H. Fetzer (ed.), Aspects of AI. Kluwer.
Lucja Iwańska (1993). Logical Reasoning in Natural Language: It is All About Knowledge. Minds and Machines 3 (4):475-510.
George Lakoff (1970). Linguistics and Natural Logic. Synthese 22 (1-2):151 - 271.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #160,204 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?