Equity, utility, and the marketplace: Emerging ethical issues of umbilical cord blood banking in australia [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (1):57-63 (2007)
Over the past decade, umbilical cord blood (UCB) has routinely been used as a source of haematopoietic stem cells for allogeneic stem cell transplants in the treatment of a range of malignant and non-malignant conditions affecting children and adults. UCB banks are a necessary part of the UCB transplant program, but their establishment has raised a number of important scientific, ethical and political issues. This paper examines the scientific and clinical evidence that has provided the basis for the establishment of UCB banks. We also discuss the major ethical issues that UCB banks raise, including ownership of cord blood, processes for obtaining consent for its collection and storage, and confidentiality. Finally, we review other concerns about commercial non-altruistic banking, including concerns about social justice, equity of access and equity of care.
|Keywords||Cord blood stem cell transplantation Blood banks Ethics Australia|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
George Selgin (1993). The Rationalization of Central Banks. Critical Review 7 (2-3):335-354.
Laurie Zoloth (2002). Stem Cell Research: A Target Article Collection Part I - Jordan's Banks, a View From the First Years of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. American Journal of Bioethics 2 (1):3 – 11.
Karama Neal (2006). Analogical Trends in Umbilical Cord Blood Legislation in the United States. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):68-70.
Bjørn Hofmann, Søren Holm & Jan Solbakk (2006). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Analogical Reasoning in Handling Emerging Technologies: The Case of Umbilical Cord Blood Biobanking”: Analogy is Like Air—Invisible and Indispensable. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W13-W14.
Bjørn Hofmann, Jan Helge Solbakk & Søren Holm (2006). Analogical Reasoning in Handling Emerging Technologies: The Case of Umbilical Cord Blood Biobanking. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):49 – 57.
S. Chan (2006). Cord Blood Banking: What Are the Real Issues? Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (11):621-622.
H. Busby (2010). The Meanings of Consent to the Donation of Cord Blood Stem Cells: Perspectives From an Interview-Based Study of a Public Cord Blood Bank in England. Clinical Ethics 5 (1):22-27.
Gabrielle Samuel, Rachel Ankeny & Ian Kerridge (2006). Mixing Metaphors in Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):58-59.
V. Moises Serrano-Delgado, Barbara Novello-Garza & Edith Valdez-Martinez (2009). Ethical Issues Relating the the Banking of Umbilical Cord Blood in Mexico. BMC Medical Ethics 10 (1):12-.
Maree Porter, Ian Kerridge & Christopher Jordens (2012). “Good Mothering” or “Good Citizenship”? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):41-47.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #181,364 of 1,792,244 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #139,362 of 1,792,244 )
How can I increase my downloads?