David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
I am interested here in using Johannes Huizinga's work on play to explore a strange, yet civilizing, phenomenon. Why do we take those social disputes in our ordinary lives that often seem most serious and therefore most divisive, turn them over to playful participants in a legal literary game, and then choose, more or less, to call the outcome of this game "justice" and to trust it as such even to the point of preferring it to the political? Why, that is, do we think that it is justice that arises from this literary play? If we are to understand how this play became and becomes justice, I argue, we must abandon current assumptions about the legal conversation to appreciate anew not only its formal elements as a game -- constitutive rules; a "lusory attitude" (Bernard Suits' term) toward those rules upon which the game depends for its continuation; and, most important for this article, its insistence upon a certain playful "disinterestedness" or, as l call it here, an alterity or otherness -- but also beyond these its archaic Greek elements: agon, ritual, chance, and, most difficult of all, the remaining elements of sacredness and the divine. This then is the rhetorical task of the article and it proceeds by way of the ancient Greeks, not to define the legal conversation by its origins, but to attempt to reopen our understanding so that we can perceive the legal conversation anew.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey Moriarty (2013). Smilansky, Arneson, and the Asymmetry of Desert. Philosophical Studies 162 (3):537-545.
Bernard Suits (1967). What is a Game? Philosophy of Science 34 (2):148-156.
Herman Cappelen (2011). Against Assertion. In Jessica Brown & Herman Cappelen (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press
Wojciech Sadurski (1984). Social Justice and Legal Justice. Law and Philosophy 3 (3):329 - 354.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #746,396 of 1,940,945 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?