David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Clinical Ethics 1 (3):159-164 (2006)
Background Although methods proposed for the conduct of ethics consultation tend to be viewed as competing approaches, they may in fact function in a complementary manner. Methods We describe the experience of ethics consultation in two ethics committees at the University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland. Results Both committees provide case consultation by a multi-disciplinary team of committee members, but with different processes. These differences in process do not necessarily lead to differences in outcome. Discussion Different methods of ethics consultation are not mutually exclusive, and can co-exist within the same institution. The practical application of one method of ethics consultation can lead to substantial variations in process between different groups of consultants. Conclusion Despite the importance of clarifying theoretical groundings, and consultation and deliberation processes, in ethics consultation, choosing between different processes may not be pressing. To assist these choices, exploration of the practical strengths and weaknesses of different methods will be necessary to assist clinical ethicists, and clinical ethics committees, in acquiring a flexible and evidence-based set of approaches to their work
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Samia A. Hurst, Stella Reiter-Theil, Arnaud Perrier, Reidun Forde, Anne-Marie Slowther, Renzo Pegoraro & Marion Danis (2007). Physicians' Access to Ethics Support Services in Four European Countries. Health Care Analysis 15 (4):321-335.
Similar books and articles
Joseph J. Fins, Matthew D. Bacchetta & Franklin G. Miller (1997). Clinical Pragmatism: A Method of Moral Problem Solving. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):129-143.
Richard E. Ashcroft (ed.) (2005). Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Lynn A. Jansen (1998). Assessing Clinical Pragmatism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (1):23-36.
Rosemarie Tong (1997). The Promises and Perils of Pragmatism: Commentary on Fins, Bacchetta, and Miller. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):147-152.
Joseph J. Fins, Franklin G. Miller & Matthew D. Bacchetta (1998). Clinical Pragmatism: Bridging Theory and Practice. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (1):37-42.
David H. Brendel & Franklin G. Miller (2008). A Plea for Pragmatism in Clinical Research Ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31.
Richard M. Zaner (1993). Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):9-31.
George J. Agich (2005). What Kind of Doing is Clinical Ethics? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):7-24.
Peter Singer, Edmund Pellegrino & Mark Siegler (2001). Clinical Ethics Revisited. BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-8.
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
R. Pedersen, S. A. Hurst, J. Schildmann, S. Schuster & B. Molewijk (2010). The Development of a Descriptive Evaluation Tool for Clinical Ethics Case Consultations. Clinical Ethics 5 (3):136-141.
Laurence B. McCullough (2005). The Critical Turn in Clinical Ethics and its Continous Enhancement. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):1 – 8.
David C. Thomasma (1994). Clinical Ethics as Medical Hermeneutics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (2).
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads57 ( #58,236 of 1,724,852 )
Recent downloads (6 months)54 ( #20,790 of 1,724,852 )
How can I increase my downloads?