Graduate studies at Western
Critical Review 12 (1-2):71-76 (1998)
|Abstract||Abstract Murray Rothbard's Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought demonstrates his mastery of the literature. But his interpretation of the development of economics reflects, and is therefore severely limited by, his Austrian?libertarian perspective. Indeed, Rothbard appropriates the history of economic thought principally to advance his perspective, as seen in his neglect of social control, his identification of his desired economic system with the natural order of things, and especially in his denigratory treatment of Adam Smith?at bottom for not being an Austrian economist and a true libertarian. A partly informed, partly myopic and sometimes useful interpretation, this is the work of an ideologue.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. Barkley Rosser, Between Cambridge and Vienna: The Risky Business of New Austrian Business Cycle Theory.
Ricardo F. Crespo, Reappraising Austrian Economics' Basic Tenets in the Light of Aristotelian Ideas.
William N. Butos (1993). The Recession and Austrian Business Cycle Theory: An Empirical Perspective. Critical Review 7 (2-3):277-306.
Leonidas Zelmanovitz, “Money and War in Murray Rothbard's A History of Money and Banking in the United States”.
Steven Horwitz (1995). Feminist Economics: An Austrian Perspective. Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (2):259-280.
Bryan Caplan (2004). Is Socialism Really “Impossible”? Critical Review 16 (1):33-52.
Walter Block (1980). On Robert Nozick's 'on Austrian Methodology'. Inquiry 23 (4):397 – 444.
Paul Lewis (2010). Certainly Not! A Critical Realist Recasting of Ludwig von Mises's Methodology of the Social Sciences. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (3):277-299.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-10-18
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?