Graduate studies at Western
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 70:1-28 (2012)
|Abstract||There is a puzzling tension in contemporary scientific attitudes towards human nature. On the one hand, evolutionary biologists correctly maintain that the traditional essentialist conception of human nature is untenable; and moreover that this is obviously so in the light of quite general and exceedingly well-known evolutionary considerations. On the other hand, talk of human nature abounds in certain regions of the sciences, especially in linguistics, psychology and cognitive science. In this paper I articulate a conception of human nature that a) captures how cognitive and behavioral scientists tend to deploy the notion whilst, b) evading standard evol-utionary objections, and c) allowing human nature – and theories thereof – to fulfill many of their traditional theoretical roles.|
|Keywords||Human nature biological essentialism natural kinds Hume|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edouard Machery (2012). Reconceptualizing Human Nature: Response to Lewens. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Technology 25 (4):475-478.
David Heyd (2003). Human Nature: An Oxymoron? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (2):151 – 169.
Allen Buchanan (2009). Human Nature and Enhancement. Bioethics 23 (3):141-150.
Roberta M. Berry (2009). Pt. 3. The Malleability of Human Nature. Reflections on Secular Foundationalism and Our Human Future / Stephen Erickson ; Nature as Second Nature : Plasticity and Habit / Peter Wake ; The Posthumanist Challenge to a Partly Naturalized Virtue Ethics. [REVIEW] In Mark J. Cherry (ed.), The Normativity of the Natural: Human Goods, Human Virtues, and Human Flourishing. Springer.
Alex Rosenberg (2009). The Biological Justification of Ethics: A Best-Case Scenario. Social Philosophy and Policy 8 (01):86-.
Thomas Rhys Williams (1959). The Evolution of a Human Nature. Philosophy of Science 26 (1):1-13.
Vadim V. Vasilyev (2013). Hume's Methodology and the Science of Human Nature. History of Philosophy Yearbook 2012:62-115.
Christopher D. Horvath (2000). Interactionism and Innateness in the Evolutionary Study of Human Nature. Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):321-337.
Rolston (1979). Can and Ought We to Follow Nature? Environmental Ethics 1 (1):7-30.
Theodore R. Schatzki (2000). The Social Bearing of Nature. Inquiry 43 (1):21 – 37.
Iii Holmes Rolston (1979). Can and Ought We to Follow Nature? Environmental Ethics 1 (1):7-30.
John Dupré (2001). Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2012-04-25
Total downloads20 ( #68,365 of 739,139 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #13,453 of 739,139 )
How can I increase my downloads?