Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 70:1-28 (2012)
|Abstract||There is a puzzling tension in contemporary scientific attitudes towards human nature. On the one hand, evolutionary biologists correctly maintain that the traditional essentialist conception of human nature is untenable; and moreover that this is obviously so in the light of quite general and exceedingly well-known evolutionary considerations. On the other hand, talk of human nature abounds in certain regions of the sciences, especially in linguistics, psychology and cognitive science. In this paper I articulate a conception of human nature that a) captures how cognitive and behavioral scientists tend to deploy the notion whilst, b) evading standard evol-utionary objections, and c) allowing human nature – and theories thereof – to fulfill many of their traditional theoretical roles.|
|Keywords||Human nature biological essentialism natural kinds Hume|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edouard Machery (2012). Reconceptualizing Human Nature: Response to Lewens. Philosophy and Technology 25 (4):475-478.
David Heyd (2003). Human Nature: An Oxymoron? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (2):151 – 169.
Allen Buchanan (2009). Human Nature and Enhancement. Bioethics 23 (3):141-150.
Roberta M. Berry (2009). Pt. 3. The Malleability of Human Nature. Reflections on Secular Foundationalism and Our Human Future / Stephen Erickson ; Nature as Second Nature : Plasticity and Habit / Peter Wake ; The Posthumanist Challenge to a Partly Naturalized Virtue Ethics. [REVIEW] In Mark J. Cherry (ed.), The Normativity of the Natural: Human Goods, Human Virtues, and Human Flourishing. Springer.
Alex Rosenberg (2009). The Biological Justification of Ethics: A Best-Case Scenario. Social Philosophy and Policy 8 (01):86-.
Thomas Rhys Williams (1959). The Evolution of a Human Nature. Philosophy of Science 26 (1):1-13.
Vadim V. Vasilyev (forthcoming). Hume's Methodology and the Science of Human Nature. History of Philosophy Yearbook 2012.
Christopher D. Horvath (2000). Interactionism and Innateness in the Evolutionary Study of Human Nature. Biology and Philosophy 15 (3).
Rolston (1979). Can and Ought We to Follow Nature? Environmental Ethics 1 (1):7-30.
Theodore R. Schatzki (2000). The Social Bearing of Nature. Inquiry 43 (1):21 – 37.
Iii Holmes Rolston (1979). Can and Ought We to Follow Nature? Environmental Ethics 1 (1):7-30.
John Dupré (2001). Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2012-04-25
Total downloads13 ( #87,931 of 549,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,333 of 549,078 )
How can I increase my downloads?