David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 35 (1):87-111 (2007)
This article considers a central ethically relevant interpersonal emotion, guilt. It is argued that guilt, as an irreducible moral category, has a constitutive role to play in our ways of conceptualizing our relations to other people. Without experiencing guilt, or being able to do so, we would not be capable of employing the moral concepts and judgments we do employ. Elaborating on this argument, the paper deals with what may be described as the "metaphysics of guilt." More generally, it is suggested, through a case study on the concept of guilt, that a moral theory avoiding naïve emotivism yet emphasizing the role of emotions in morality can and should pay attention to the transcendental status of emotions such as guilt--emotions constitutive of our concept of moral seriousness. Instead of psychologizing moral emotions, the paper employs Raimond Gaita's Wittgenstein-inspired way of examining the place of the concepts of guilt and remorse in our ethical language-use. Finally, some methodological remarks on the possibility of transcendental reflection in moral philosophy are presented. While it is not necessary to commit oneself to any specific religious tradition in order to emphasize the constitutive role of guilt in the way suggested in the paper, it turns out that the moral depth of this concept requires that one is least open to religiously relevant ways of using moral language. In the fundamental metaphysical sense examined in the paper, guilt is a concept whose home language-game is religious rather than secular ethics
|Keywords||transcendental philosophy remorse guilt evil emotions Fyodor Dostoevsky Raimond Gaita|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sami Pihlström (2009). Ethical Unthinkabilities and Philosophical Seriousness. Metaphilosophy 40 (5):656-670.
Similar books and articles
Dwayne A. Tunstall (2009). Transcendental Pragmatisms. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):149-159.
Nora Hämäläinen (2011). Sami Pihlström, Transcendental Guilt: Reflections on Ethical Finitude. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (3):373-378.
Anthony L. Brueckner (1983). Transcendental Arguments I. Noûs 17 (4):551-575.
Anthony L. Brueckner (1984). Transcendental Arguments II. Noûs 18 (2):197-225.
John R. Sachs (1992). Transcendental Method in Theology and the Normativity of Human Experience. Philosophy and Theology 7 (2):213-225.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1996). ‘Kant, Hegel, and the Transcendental Material Conditions of Possible Experience’. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 33:23-41.
Lewis S. Feuer (1968). God, Guilt, and Logic: The Psychological Basis of the Ontological Argument. Inquiry 11 (1-4):257 – 281.
Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Moral Rules, the Moral Sentiments, and Behavior: Toward a Theory of an Optimal Moral System.
Mathias Risse (2005). On God and Guilt: A Reply to Aaron Ridley. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 29 (1):46-53.
Fabrice Teroni & Otto Bruun (2011). Shame, Guilt and Morality. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2):223-245.
Rainer Reisenzein (2009). Emotional Experience in the Computational Belief-Desire Theory of Emotion. Emotion Review 1 (3):214-222.
Daniel M. Haybron (2005). On Being Happy or Unhappy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):287–317.
Gunnar Karlsson & Lennart Gustav Sjöberg (2009). The Experiences of Guilt and Shame: A Phenomenological–Psychological Study. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (3):335 - 355.
Joel Smith (2003). Self-Consciousness and Embodied Experience. Dissertation, UCL
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads5 ( #326,752 of 1,696,592 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,146 of 1,696,592 )
How can I increase my downloads?