David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
HEC Forum 24 (2):115-126 (2012)
Few studies exist which look at psychological factors associated with physician sexual misconduct. In this study, we explore family dysfunction as a possible risk factor associated with physician sexual misconduct. Six hundred thirteen physicians referred to a continuing medical education (CME) course for sexual misconduct were administered the FACES-II survey, a validated and reliable measure of family dynamics. The survey was part of a self-learning activity. We collected data from February 2000 to February 2009. Participants were predominantly white, middle-aged males who represented the full range of medical specialties. Their results were compared against a sample of 177 physicians. The FACES-II is a self-report test that measures family of origin (the family in which one was raised) dynamics on two dimensions (1) flexibility, ranging from too flexible (chaotic) to not flexible enough (rigid) and (2) cohesion ranging from too close (enmeshed) to not close enough (disengaged). The most common family pattern observed among physicians accused of sexual misconduct was rigid flexibility paired with disengaged cohesion, indicative of unhealthy family functioning. This pattern was significantly different than the pattern observed in the comparison group. Physicians who engage in sexual misconduct are more likely to have family of origin dysfunction. Ethics is developmental and learned in one’s family of origin. Family of origin dynamics may be one risk factor predisposing one to ethical violations. These findings have important implications for screening, education, and treatment across the medical education continuum.
|Keywords||Sexual misconduct Boundary violations Professionalism Continuing medical education|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ronald J. Christie (1986). Ethical Issues in Family Medicine. Oxford University Press.
David J. Doukas, Using the Family Covenant in Planning End-of-Life Care: Obligations and Promises of Patients, Families, and Physicians.
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos, David C. Malloy, Donald Sharpe & Shannon Fuchs-Lacelle (2003). The Ethical Ideologies of Psychologists and Physicians: A Preliminary Comparison. Ethics and Behavior 13 (1):97 – 104.
Eugene V. Boisaubin (2004). Observations of Physician, Patient and Family Perceptions of Informed Consent in Houston, Texas. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):225 – 236.
David J. Doukas & Jessica W. Berg (2001). The Family Covenant and Genetic Testing. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):2 – 10.
Peter Grantham (1981). Ethical Issues and the Family Doctor. Bioethics Quarterly 3 (3-4):180-189.
Heather J. Gert (1995). Family Resemblances and Criteria. Synthese 105 (2):177-190.
Fiona A. White, Pauline Howie & Janette Perz (2000). Predictors of Moral Thought in Two Contrasting Adolescent Samples. Ethics and Behavior 10 (3):199 – 214.
Ray Moseley (2001). Family Physicians and the Family Covenant Model's Usefulness in Solving Genetic Testing Conflicts. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):28-29.
Barry Hoffmaster & Wayne Weston (1987). The Patient in the Family and the Family in the Patient. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Marc A. Rodwin (2010). Drug Advertising, Continuing Medical Education, and Physician Prescribing: A Historical Review and Reform Proposal. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (4):807-815.
Mark S. Blodgett, Colette Dumas & Alberto Zanzi (2011). Emerging Trends in Global Ethics: A Comparative Study of U.S. And International Family Business Values. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 99 (S1):29-38.
John D. Lantos & William L. Meadow (2011). Should the “Slow Code” Be Resuscitated? American Journal of Bioethics 11 (11):8-12.
Massimiliano Aragona, Raffaella Catapano, Camillo Loriedo & Daniela Alliani (2011). The "Psychosomatic" Family System: Are Families with Eating Disorders More Enmeshed and Rigid Than Normal Controls? Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 4 (1):10-15.
Rebecca G. Long & K. Michael Mathews (2011). Ethics in the Family Firm. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (2):287-308.
Added to index2011-11-24
Total downloads3 ( #323,743 of 1,413,333 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,079 of 1,413,333 )
How can I increase my downloads?