Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (3):301-317 (2004)
|Abstract||Considerations of virtue and character appear from time to time in the agricultural biotechnology literature. Critics of the technologies often suggest that they are contrary to some virtue (usually humility) or do not fit with the image of ourselves and the human place in the world that we ought to embrace. In this article, I consider the aretaic or virtue-based objection that to engage in agricultural biotechnology is to exhibit arrogance, hubris, and disaffection. In section one, I discuss Gary Comstock's treatment of this objection. In section two, I provide an alternative interpretation of the objection that more accurately reflects the concerns of those who offer the criticism than does Comstock's standard interpretation. In sections three and four, I assess the objection. I argue that despite its merits, the objection does not justify global opposition to agricultural biotechnology. Instead, it favors a limited endorsement position not unlike the one defended by Comstock.|
|Keywords||agricultural biotechnology aretaic objection Gary Comstock humility limited endorsement virtue ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wes Jackson (1991). Our Vision for the Agricultural Sciences Need Not Include Biotechnology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (2):207-215.
Donald N. Duvick (1991). Our Vision for the Agricultural Sciences Needs to Include Biotechnology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (2):200-206.
Tony Smith (1999). Biotechnology and Global Justice. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (3):219-242.
Wayne Ouderkirk (2002). Book Review: Gary L. Comstock. Vexing Nature? On the Ethical Case Against Agricultural Biotechnology. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer, 2000. [REVIEW] Ethics and the Environment 7 (2):185-193.
Susanna Hornig Priest & Allen W. Gillespie (2000). Seeds of Discontent: Expert Opinion, Mass Media Messages, and the Public Image of Agricultural Biotechnology. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):529-539.
Jeffrey Burkhardt (2008). The Ethics of Agri-Food Biotechnology : How Can an Agricultural Technology Be so Important? In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Dane Scott (2011). The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):207-226.
Ronald Sandler (2005). A Response to Martin Calkins's “How Casuistry and Virtue Ethics Might Break the Ideological Stalemate Troubling Agricultural Biotechnology”. Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (2):319-327.
Dane Scott (2005). The Magic Bullet Criticism of Agricultural Biotechnology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):189-197.
Jeffrey Burkhardt (2001). Agricultural Biotechnology and the Future Benefits Argument. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):135-145.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #246,187 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?