David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 17 (4):343-354 (2011)
This paper presents in outline Luigi Ferrajoli’s axiomatic and general theory of law, as developed in his lifelong work Principia Iuris . The first section focuses on the three main aspects of the theory: the methodological, the theoretical and the pragmatic, which respectively represent the theory’s syntax, semantics and its pragmatics. Ferrajoli identifies three deontic gaps of norms: firstly, the one between their validity and efficacy ; secondly, the one between their justice and validity ; and finally, and most importantly, the one between validity and existence (i.e. normative force). The presence of such gaps is, according to Ferrajoli, the extraordinary innovation that entrenched constitutions have brought into modern legal systems, by establishing norms that are superior to statutes and case law. In this sense, all normative phenomena (except for the constitution itself) can be conceived both as norms and as facts. In the second section the role of juridical science is briefly discussed
|Keywords||Axiomatisation General theory of law Deontic gap ‘Unlawful law’ Constitutionalism Juridical reason|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni B. Ratti (2010). Validity and Defeasibility in the Legal Domain. Law and Philosophy 29 (5):601 - 626.
Norberto Bobbio (1988). Reason in Law. Ratio Juris 1 (2):97-108.
Eugenio Bulygin (2008). What Can One Expect From Logic in the Law? (Not Everything, but More Than Something: A Reply to Susan Haack). Ratio Juris 21 (1):150-156.
Von Rudolf Carnap (1958). Beobachtungssprache und theoretische sprache. Dialectica 12 (3‐4):236-248.
Susan Haack (2007). On Logic in the Law: "Something, but Not All". Ratio Juris 20 (1):1-31.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Luca Baccelli (2011). The Logical Foundation of Fundamental Rights and Their Universality. Res Publica 17 (4):369-376.
Pietro Costa (2011). Reading Principia Iuris. Res Publica 17 (4):317-325.
Dario Castiglione (2011). Introduction. Res Publica 17 (4):311-315.
C. Heidemann (2000). The Creation of Normative Facts. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):263-281.
Hans Kelsen (1990). General Theory of Norms. Oxford University Press.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
P. W. (1997). Legal Validity Qua Specific Mode of Existence. Law and Philosophy 16 (5):479-505.
Dick W. P. Ruiter (1997). Legal Validity Qua Specific Mode of Existence. Law and Philosophy 16 (5):479 - 505.
Frederick Schauer (2010). Was Austin Right After All? On the Role of Sanctions in a Theory of Law. Ratio Juris 23 (1):1-21.
Neil MacCormick (2007). Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
G. Sartor (2000). Legal Validity as Doxastic Obligation: From Definition to Normativity. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 19 (5):585-625.
U. Schmill (2000). The Dynamic Order of Norms, Empowerment and Related Concepts. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):283-310.
Added to index2011-08-27
Total downloads4 ( #298,430 of 1,692,221 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #184,284 of 1,692,221 )
How can I increase my downloads?