Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (1):71-88 (2009)
|Abstract||This paper addresses the experimental trade?off between the exercise of control over the actions of the experimental participants and the potential to provide understanding about human behavior. Control is a requirement of the experimental method to produce pertinent and intelligible results for scientific inquiry. But the more control is exercised the more the experimental results are the outcome of economists' actions. Economic experiments must therefore achieve a difficult balance. They must elicit intelligible behavior while ensuring that the actions of those taking part in the experiment are not determined by the design set?up and the rules of the experiment. The paper puts forward criteria for the analysis of the level of participation of experimental subjects in economics experiments and applies them to several experiments to illustrate the relevance of assessing the agency of experimental participants when deriving inferences about human behavior.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ana C. Santos (2007). The 'Materials' of Experimental Economics: Technological Versus Behavioral Experiments. Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (3):311-337.
Mark S. Peacock (2007). The Conceptual Construction of Altruism: Ernst Fehr’s Experimental Approach to Human Conduct. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (1):3-23.
Nat Hansen (2013). A Slugfest of Intuitions: Contextualism and Experimental Design. Synthese 190 (10):1771-1792.
Vladimir A. Lefebvre (2006). Sacredness in an Experimental Chamber. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):189-190.
Shaun Hargreaves Heap, Arjan Verschoor & Daniel John Zizzo (2012). A Test of the Experimental Method in the Spirit of Popper. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (1):63-76.
Ralph Hertwig & Andreas Ortmann (2008). Deception in Experiments: Revisiting the Arguments in its Defense. Ethics and Behavior 18 (1):59 – 92.
Alvin E. Roth (2001). Form and Function in Experimental Design. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):427-428.
Hugh Lacey (2002). Teleological Behaviorism and Altruism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):266-267.
Terence C. Burnham & Robert Kurzban (2005). On the Limitations of Quasi-Experiments. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):818-819.
Martin K. Jones (2008). On the Autonomy of Experiments in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (4):391-407.
Ralph Hertwig & Andreas Ortmann (2001). Experimental Practices in Economics: A Methodological Challenge for Psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):383-403.
Marisa Velasco (2002). Experimentacion y Tecnicas Computacionales. Theoria 17 (2):317-331.
Glenn W. Harrison & E. Elisabet Rutström (2001). Doing It Both Ways – Experimental Practice and Heuristic Context. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):413-414.
Chris Starmer (1999). Experiments in Economics: Should We Trust the Dismal Scientists in White Coats? Journal of Economic Methodology 6 (1):1-30.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads3 ( #213,980 of 741,499 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,802 of 741,499 )
How can I increase my downloads?