Chisholm on Brentano's thesis
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. Chicago: Open Court. 25--201 (1997)
Roderick Chisholm provides, in different places, two formulations of Brentano's thesis about the relation between the psychological and the intentional: (1) all and only psychological sentences are intentional; (2) no psychological intentional sentence is equivalent to a nonintentional sentence. Chisholm also presents several definitions of intentionality. Some of these allow that a sentence is intentional while its negation is nonintentional, which ruins the prospects of defending the more plausible and interesting thesis (2). A generalization of the notion of logical independence to any number of mutually independent sentences permits a revision of Chisholm's criteria of intentionality that ensures that a sentence is intentional on a criterion exactly when its negation is as well.
|Keywords||Analysis Mind Brentano Chisholm, R|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stephen F. Barker (1982). Intensionality and Intentionality. Philosophy Research Archives 8:95-109.
Roderick M. Chisholm (1986). Brentano and Intrinsic Value. Cambridge University Press.
Jaegwon Kim (1997). Chisholm on Intentionality: De Se, de Re, and de Dicto. In Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. Chicago: Open Court.
Linda L. McAlister (1974). Chisholm and Brentano on Intentionality. Review of Metaphysics 28 (December):328-338.
Michael Clark (1965). Intentional Objects. Analysis 25 (January):123-128.
Ausonio Marras (ed.) (1972). Intentionality, Mind, And Language. London: University Of Illinois Press.
Edmund Runggaldier (1989). On the Scholastic or Aristotelian Roots of “Intentionality” in Brentano. Topoi 8 (2):97-103.
Philip J. Bartok (2005). Brentano's Intentionality Thesis: Beyond the Analytic and Phenomenological Readings. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):437-460.
Joseph Margolis (2004). Reflections on Intentionality. In Dale Jacquette (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Brentano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 131.
Linda L. McAlister (ed.) (1977). The Philosophy of Brentano. Humanities Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?