|Abstract||This essay examines the similarities and dissimilarities between Freudian psychoanalysis and the form of analysis outlined by Sartre in Being and Nothingness in relation to the theory of inten- tionality developed by Brentano and Husserl. The principal aim of the paper is to establish a suitable starting point for a dialogue between these two forms of analysis, whose respective terminologies with respect to consciousness and the unconscious appear to cancel one another out.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Lear (1990/1998). Love and its Place in Nature: A Philosophical Interpretation of Freudian Psychoanalysis. Yale University Press.
William J. Massicotte, A Philosophical Examination of Recent Clinical and Theoretical Psychoanalysis.
Ted Meyer (2001). Shrink Yourself: The Complete Do-It-Yourself Guide to Freudian Psychoanalysis. Thomas Dunne Books/St. Martin's Griffin.
Maarten Boudry & Filip Buekens (2011). The Epistemic Predicament of a Pseudoscience: Social Constructivism Confronts Freudian Psychoanalysis. Theoria 77 (2):159-179.
John Ambrosio (2010). A Fearsome Trap: The Will to Know, the Obligation to Confess, and the Freudian Subject of Desire. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (7):728-741.
Evelien Geerts, Luce Irigaray: The (Un)Dutiful Daughter of Psychoanalysis. A Feminist ‘Moving Through and Beyond’ the Phallogocentric Discourse of Psychoanalysis.
Alain Flajoliet (2010). Sartre's Phenomenological Anthropology Between Psychoanalysis and 'Daseinsanalysis'. Sartre Studies International 16 (1):40-59.
Added to index2009-07-15
Total downloads35 ( #34,083 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?