Graduate studies at Western
Hypatia 13 (3):146 - 167 (1998)
|Abstract||Recent "gender, environment, and sustainable development" accounts raise pointed questions about the complicity of Enlightenment philosophies of science with failures of Third World development policies and the current environmental crisis. The strengths of these analyses come from distinctive ways they link androcentric, economistic, and nature-blind aspects of development thinking to "the Enlightenment dream." In doing so they share perspectives with and provide resources for other influential schools of science studies|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Kurtz & Tim Madigan (eds.) (1994). Challenges to the Enlightenment: In Defense of Reason and Science. Prometheus Books.
Robert Figueroa & Sandra G. Harding (eds.) (2003). Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology. Routledge.
M. Haque (2000). Environmental Discourse and Sustainable Development Linkages and Limitations. Ethics and the Environment 5 (1):3-21.
Charles W. Mills (2002). Defending the Radical Enlightenment. Social Philosophy Today 18:9-29.
William L. Barthelemy & Sheldon Wein (1996). Development Officers and Discrimination. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:433-443.
A. H. T. Fergus & J. I. A. Rowney (2005). Sustainable Development: Lost Meaning and Opportunity? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 60 (1):17 - 27.
Margaret J. Osler (ed.) (1991). Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Cambridge University Press.
James Bohman (2005). We, Heirs of Enlightenment: Critical Theory, Democracy and Social Science. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (3):353 – 377.
Claire Colebrook (2004). Gender. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads18 ( #74,621 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?