David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 18 (1):65 – 82 (1975)
Theories in the behavioral sciences are constrained so that stated relationships are empirically testable and explanations have predictive power. These constraints constitute the classical paradigm, and are trivial just when ?causal relationships? do not hold. It appears that such relationships do not hold for linguistic, and presumably other, behaviors, thus precluding study within the classical paradigm. This compels study of those behaviors in terms of the non?traditional approach to testability and explanation developed in Chomskyan linguistics. These constitute the grammatical paradigm. The existence of two paradigms requires that any inquiry begin by determining which paradigm is appropriate.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Noam Chomsky (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. The MIT Press.
Thomas S. Kuhn (1996/2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joshua Knobe & Bertram Malle (2002). Self and Other in the Explanation of Behavior: 30 Years Later. Psychologica Belgica 42:113-130.
Michael H. Kelly (1999). Indirect Representation of Grammatical Class at the Lexeme Level. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):49-50.
William D. Casebeer & James E. Parco (2003). To Have and to Eat Cake: The Biscriptive Role of Game-Theoretic Explanations of Human Choice Behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):159-160.
Douglas V. Porpora (1993). Cultural Rules and Material Relations. Sociological Theory 11 (2):212-229.
John Cornwell (ed.) (2004). Explanations: Styles of Explanation in Science. Oxford University Press.
Stephen P. Hinshaw (2005). Objective Assessment of Covert Antisocial Behavior: Predictive Validity and Ethical Considerations. Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):259 – 269.
Chris M. Bell & Justin Hughes-Jones (2008). Power, Self-Regulation and the Moralization of Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3):503 - 514.
John Monterosso, Edward B. Royzman & Barry Schwartz (2005). Explaining Away Responsibility: Effects of Scientific Explanation on Perceived Culpability. Ethics and Behavior 15 (2):139 – 158.
Rob Vanderbeeken & Erik Weber (2002). Dispositional Explanations of Behavior. Behavior and Philosophy 30:43 - 59.
Merrilee H. Salmon (2003). Causal Explanations of Behavior. Philosophy of Science 70 (4):720-738.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads2 ( #657,719 of 1,790,225 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #427,637 of 1,790,225 )
How can I increase my downloads?