Liberalism and the limits of justice
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University (2003)
A liberal society seeks not to impose a single way of life, but to leave its citizens as free as possible to choose their own values and ends. It therefore must govern by principles of justice that do not presuppose any particular vision of the good life. But can any such principles be found? And if not, what are the consequences for justice as a moral and political ideal? These are the questions Michael Sandel takes up in this penetrating critique of contemporary liberalism. Sandel locates modern liberalism in the tradition of Kant, and focuses on its most influential recent expression in the work of John Rawls. In the most important challenge yet to Rawls' theory of justice, Sandel traces the limits of liberalism to the conception of the person that underlies it, and argues for a deeper understanding of community than liberalism allows.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$86.61 new (24% off) $96.23 direct from Amazon (15% off) $96.93 used (15% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||JC578.S26 1998|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Miriam Ronzoni (2010). Teleology, Deontology, and the Priority of the Right: On Some Unappreciated Distinctions. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):453 - 472.
Philip J. Ivanhoe (2010). A Confucian Perspective on Abortion. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (1):37-51.
Lo Ping-cheung (2010). Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide From Confucian Moral Perspectives. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (1):53-77.
Quentin Skinner (1991). Who Are 'We'? Ambiguities of the Modern Self. Inquiry 34 (2):133 – 153.
Michael Buckley (2010). The Structure of Justification in Political Constructivism. Metaphilosophy 41 (5):669-689.
Similar books and articles
Giorgio Baruchello (2004). Cesare Beccaria and the Cruelty of Liberalism: An Essay on Liberalism of Fear and its Limits. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):303-313.
Robert S. Taylor (2011). Reconstructing Rawls: The Kantian Foundations of Justice as Fairness. Penn State University Press.
Ruth Abbey (2007). Back Toward a Comprehensive Liberalism? Justice as Fairness, Gender, and Families. Political Theory 35 (1):5 - 28.
Amy R. McCready (1999). The Limits of Logic: A Critique of Sandel's Philosophical Anthropology. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4):81-102.
Brian Barry (1984). Book Review:Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Michael J. Sandel. [REVIEW] Ethics 94 (3):523-.
Alexander Kaufman (2006). Rawls's Practical Conception of Justice: Opinion, Tradition and Objectivity in Political Liberalism. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (1):23-43.
David W. Wills (1978). Racial Justice and the Limits of American Liberalism. Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (2):187 - 220.
João Cardoso Rosas (2006). Justice and Restrain. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:153-157.
Jonathan Jacobs (2011). Criminal Justice and the Liberal Polity. Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (2):173-191.
Percy B. Lehning (1998). The Coherence of Rawls's Plea for Democratic Equality. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?