David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Man and World 26 (3):287-302 (1993)
While there are numerous differences between the approaches taken by Maurice Merleau-Ponty and James J. Gibson, the basic motivation of the two thinkers, as well as the internal logic of their respective views, is extraordinarily close. Both were guided throughout their lives by an attempt to overcome the dualism of subject and object, and both devoted considerable attention to their "Gestaltist" predecessors. There can be no doubt but that it is largely because of this common cause that the subsequent development of their ideas is so similar. It is not my objective in what follows merely to demonstrate a similarity between two lines of thought. Instead, I will try to show that each approach gains considerably from attention to the other. There are numerous ways to begin such a project, each about as arbitrary as the next. For present purposes, I shall take as of central importance the question of the character of the perceived world, both in relation to the traditionally opposed mental and material "substances", and in relation to its identification and individuation of things vis a vis one another and vis a vis ourselves. This will implicate especially Gibson's "affordances" and Merleau-Ponty's thesis concerning the "materiality of meaning."
|Keywords||affordances perception Gibson Merleau-Pony meaning|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
David Grandy (2011). Gibson's Ambient Light and Light Speed Constancy. Philosophical Psychology 25 (4):1-16.
Similar books and articles
Don Ihde & Evan Selinger (2004). Merleau-Ponty and Epistemology Engines. Human Studies 27 (4):361 - 376.
Galen A. Johnson (1996). Thinking in Color: Paul Klee and Merleau-Ponty. In Véronique Fóti (ed.), Merleau-Ponty: Difference, Materiality, Painting.
Glen Mazis (1999). Chaos Theory and Merleau-Ponty's Ontology: Beyond the Dead Father's Paralysis Towards a Dynamic and Fragile Materiality. In OLkowski and Morely (ed.), Merleau-Ponty: Interiority and Exteriority, Psychic Life and the orld. SUNY Press. 217--241.
Sandra B. Rosenthal & Patrick L. Bourgeois (1987). Peirce, Merleau-Ponty, and Perceptual Experience: A Kantian Heritage. International Studies in Philosophy 19 (3):33-42.
M. Reuter (1999). Merleau-Ponty's Notion of Pre-Reflective Intentionality. Synthese 118 (1):69--88.
Osborne P. Wiggins Jr (1979). Merleau-Ponty and Piaget: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology. [REVIEW] Man and World 12 (1):21-34.
Linda Singer (1981). Merleau-Ponty on the Concept of Style. Man and World 14 (2):153-163.
M. C. Dillon (1971). Gestalt Theory and Merleau-Ponty's Concept of Intentionality. Man and World 4 (4):436-459.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1993). The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting. Northwestern University Press.
Added to index2009-07-07
Total downloads247 ( #1,758 of 1,102,884 )
Recent downloads (6 months)118 ( #337 of 1,102,884 )
How can I increase my downloads?