David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 35 (1):113 – 137 (1992)
Anastylosis is the reconstruction of a monument using the original fragments and filling in the missing parts with an easily distinguishable modern material. This long review of "The Fragmentation of Reason; Preface to a Pragmatic Theory of Cognitive Evaluation" (MIT, 1990) by Stephen P Stich reconstructs, while preserving their original shapes, the conceptions of reason, truth, and rationality that Stich attempts to shatter. The review agrees with Stich's Chapter 3 which is itself highly critical of some philosophical views about evolution and rationality, and it disagrees with each of the other five chapters. Fanciful stories about food accompany and illustrate some of these disagreements.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Review author[S.]: Stephen P. Stich (1991). The Fragmentation of Reason: Précis of Two Chapters. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1):179-183.
Kevin Possin (1986). The Case Against Stich's Syntactic Theory of Mind. Philosophical Studies 49 (May):405-18.
Michael Bishop (2009). Reflections on Cognitive and Epistemic Diversity : Can a Stich in Time Save Quine? In Dominic Murphy & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Stich and His Critics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Review author[S.]: L. Jonathan Cohen (1991). Stephen P. Stich, the Fragmentation of Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1):185-188.
Review author[S.]: Alvin I. Goldman (1991). Stephen P. Stich: The Fragmentation of Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1):189-193.
Nenad Smokrovic (1995). Intentionalism and Rationality (a Criticism of Stich's Slippery Slope Argument). Acta Analytica 14 (14):101-111.
Michael Devitt (2009). On Determining What There Isn't. In Dominic Murphy & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Stich and His Critics. Blackwell.
Review author[S.]: Gilbert Harman (1991). Justification, Truth, Goals, and Pragmatism: Comments on Stich's Fragmentation of Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1):195-199.
John I. Biro & Kirk A. Ludwig (1994). Are There More Than Minimal a Priori Limits on Irrationality? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1):89-102.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads6 ( #207,107 of 1,102,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,435 of 1,102,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?