Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Literature 28 (2):417-429 (2004)
|Abstract||: Tolstoy critiques the assumption one can live a meaningful life merely by following social conventions. Though they may give a semblance of control, they do not prepare one to face mortality. Compassion for others enables one to transmute a preoccupation with filling one's preferences and desires to an appreciation of others and one's individuality. In telling of Ivan's death, Tolstoy shows the ineffectiveness of the practice of medicine and marriage when they are treated only as conventions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Caws (2000). Moral Certainty in Tolstoy. Philosophy and Literature 24 (1):49-66.
Roy W. Perrett (1985). Tolstoy, Death and the Meaning of Life. Philosophy 60 (232):231-245.
Emyr Vaughan Thomas (1997). Wittgenstein and Tolstoy: The Authentic Orientation. Religious Studies 33 (4):363-377.
Ira Newman (2008). Learning From Tolstoy: Forgetfulness and Recognition in Literary Edification. Philosophia 36 (1):43-54.
Christopher Michaelson (2008). Work and the Most Terrible Life. Journal of Business Ethics 77 (3):335 - 345.
Leo Tolstoy (2010). A Confession. Hesperus.
Steven P. Feldman (2004). The Professional Conscience: A Psychoanalytic Study of Moral Character in Tolstoy's the Death of Ivan Ilych. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 49 (4):311-328.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #71,527 of 751,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,163 of 751,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?