Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):35-44 (1977)
|Abstract||In Anarchy, State and Utopia, Robert Nozick argues, first, that free-market anarchism is unstable -that it will inevitably lead back to the state; and, second, that without a certain "redistributive" proviso, the model is unjust. If either of these things is the case, the model defeats itself, for its justification purports to be that it provides a morally acceptable alternative to government (and therefore to the state). I argue, against Nozick's contention, that his "dominant protection agency" neither meets his monopoly condition for statehood nor need run afowl of his redistributive requirement. This being the case, his argument against free market anarchism fails.|
|Keywords||anarchism free market nozick|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Vallentyne (2007). Review of Dale F. Murray, Nozick, Autonomy and Compensation. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (12).
Charles Sayward & Wayne Wasserman (1981). Has Nozick Justified the State? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62:411-415.
John Levendis, Walter Block & Joseph Morrel (2006). Nuclear Power. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (1):37 - 49.
Dennis Attick & Deron Boyles (2010). Montessori, Dewey, and Capitalism: Educational Theory for a Free Market in Education. Education and Culture 26 (1).
Helga Varden (2009). Nozick's Reply to the Anarchist. Law and Philosophy 28 (6):585 - 616.
Lawrence Souder (2010). A Free-Market Model for Media Ethics: Adam Smith's Looking Glass. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 25 (1):53 – 64.
Ralf M. Bader (2011). The Framework for Utopia. In The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's 'Anarchy, State, and Utopia'. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-02-16
Total downloads38 ( #30,920 of 549,124 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #7,802 of 549,124 )
How can I increase my downloads?