David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dialogue 16 (03):485-498 (1977)
According to John A Barker, whether an argument begs the question is purely a matter of logical form (Dialogue, 1976). According to me, it is also a matter of epistemic conditions; some arguments which beg the question in some contexts need not beg the question in every context (Analysis, 1972). I point out difficulties in Barker's treatment and defend my own views against some of his criticisms. In the concluding section, "Alleged difficulties with disjunctive syllogism," I defend the validity of disjunctive syllogism against the views of Alan Ross Anderson and Nuel D Belnap, Jr., ask pointed questions about the notion of intensional disjunction, and suggest how my treatment of begging the question can be extended to deal with the so-called paradoxes of strict implication.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
David H. Sanford (1990). The Inductive Support of Inductive Rules: Themes From Max Black. Dialectica 44 (1‐2):23-41.
Similar books and articles
John A. Barker (1976). The Fallacy of Begging the Question. Dialogue 15 (02):241-255.
Andrea Iacona & Diego Marconi (2005). Petitio Principii: What's Wrong? Facta Philosophica 7 (1):19-34.
David H. Sanford (1988). Begging the Question as Involving Actual Belief and Inconceivable Without It. Metaphilosophy 19 (1):32–37.
John Martin Fischer & Garrett Pendergraft (2013). Does the Consequence Argument Beg the Question? Philosophical Studies 166 (3):575-595.
Douglas N. Walton (1994). Begging the Question as a Pragmatic Fallacy. Synthese 100 (1):95 - 131.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (1999). Begging the Question. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):174 – 191.
David H. Sanford (1972). Begging the Question. Analysis 32 (6):197-199.
Allan Hazlett (2006). Epistemic Conceptions of Begging the Question. Erkenntnis 65 (3):343 - 363.
D. A. Truncellito (2004). Running in Circles About Begging the Question. Argumentation 18 (3):325-329.
Roy A. Sorensen (1996). Unbeggable Questions. Analysis 56 (1):51–55.
John A. Barker (1978). The Nature of Question-Begging Arguments. Dialogue 17 (03):490-498.
Paul K. Moser (2000). Skepticism, Question Begging, and Burden Shifting. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:209-217.
Michael R. Baumer (1985). Sketch for a Modal Interpretation of Descartes' Cogito. Philosophy Research Archives 11:635-655.
Stephen T. Davis (1976). Anselm And Question-Begging: A Reply To William Rowe'S Comments On Professor Davis' 'Does The Ontological Argument Beg The Question'. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7:448-457.
Added to index2010-09-25
Total downloads7 ( #185,233 of 1,100,902 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,065 of 1,100,902 )
How can I increase my downloads?