David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind 85 (April):189-208 (1976)
The primary objects of hearing are sounds: everything we hear we hear by hearing a sound. (This claim differs from Berkeley’s that we hear only sounds and from Aristotle’s that we only hear sounds.) Colored regions are primary objects of sight, and pressure resistant regions are primary objects of perception by touch. By definition, the primary objects of perception are physical. The properties of the primary objects of perception are exactly the properties sense-datum theories attribute to sense-data. Indirect Realism holds that awareness of sense-data (or something similar) mediates our perception of primary objects. Direct Realism denies this. The question when the perception of a primary object, such as parts of the surfaces of a hat and coat, is thereby the perception of a non-primary object, such as a person, is independent of the disagreement between Direct and Indirect Realism.
|Keywords||Epistemology Metaphysics Object Perception Urmson, J|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jennifer Matey (2012). Representing the Impossible. Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.
Todd Buras (2008). Three Grades of Immediate Perception: Thomas Reid's Distinctions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (3):603–632.
Leonard S. Carrier (1981). Experience And The Objects Of Perception. Washington: University Press Of America.
Casey O'Callaghan (2007). Echoes. The Monist 90 (3):403-414.
José Luis Bermúdez (2000). Naturalized Sense Data. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):353 - 374.
Pierre le Morvan (2004). Arguments Against Direct Realism and How to Counter Them. American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (3):221-234.
N. M. L. Nathan (2005). Direct Realism: Proximate Causation and the Missing Object. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 20 (36):3-6.
John A. Foster (2000). The Nature of Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
Casey O'Callaghan (2008). Object Perception: Vision and Audition. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):803-829.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #42,873 of 1,100,079 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #51,435 of 1,100,079 )
How can I increase my downloads?