Graduate studies at Western
In John T. Sanders & Jan Narveson (eds.), For and Against the State: New Philosophical Readings. Rowman and Littlefield (1996)
|Abstract||My objective in this paper is to address a handful of issues that typically get raised in discussions of philosophical anarchism. Some of these issues arise in discussions among partisans of anarchism, and some are more likely to be raised in efforts to defend the state against its opponents. My hope is to focus the argument in such a way as to make clearer the main issues that are at stake from the point of view of at least one version of philosophical anarchism.|
|Keywords||anarchism free market state|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John T. Sanders (1977). The Free Market Model Versus Government: A Reply to Nozick. Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):35-44.
Charles Sayward (1982). Anarchism and Rights Violations. Critica 14 (40):105-116.
Charles Sayward & Wayne Wasserman (1981). Has Nozick Justified the State? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62:411-415.
Robert Louis Hoffman (ed.) (1970/2010). Anarchism as Political Philosophy. Aldinetransaction.
John T. Sanders & Jan Narveson (eds.) (1996). For and Against the State: New Philosophical Readings. Rowman and Littlefield.
Milton Fisk (1985). The State and the Market in Rawls. Studies in East European Thought 30 (4):347-364.
Ryan Windeknecht (2012). Law Without Legitimacy or Justification? The Flawed Foundations of Philosophical Anarchism. Res Publica 18 (2):173-188.
Peter T. Manicas (1982). John Dewey: Anarchism and the Political State. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 18 (2):133 - 158.
Jeffrey H. Reiman (1972). In Defense of Political Philosophy. New York,Harper & Row.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads69 ( #15,490 of 740,021 )
Recent downloads (6 months)38 ( #2,647 of 740,021 )
How can I increase my downloads?