The Tide is Turning on the Separation Thesis?
Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (4):561-565 (2008)
| Abstract | In my article "Understanding the Separation Thesis" I noted that most scholars in the business ethics field seemed to have accepted R. Edward Freeman's argument to the effect that what he calls "the separation thesis" should be rejected. I argue, however, that they seemed to understand this thesis (and its rejection) in quite different ways. This volume contains three responses to my article which, interestingly enough, can be taken to corroborate my original argument. I here make some brief comments on these responses. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
William Harper (1998). Judging Who Should Live: Schneiderman and Jecker on the Duty Not to Treat. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (5):500 – 515.
Michael Juffé (2007). Levinas as (Mis)Reader of Spinoza. Levinas Studies 2:153-173.
R. Edward Freeman (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
R. Edward Freeman (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
Kirsten E. Martin & R. Edward Freeman (2004). The Separation of Technology and Ethics in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 53 (4):353-364.
James Morauta (2004). Three Separation Theses. Law and Philosophy 23 (2):111-135.
Ben Wempe (2008). Understanding the Separation Thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (4):549-553.
Joakim Sandberg (2008). Understanding the Separation Thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (2):213-232.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-04-08Total downloads22 ( #57,056 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |

