David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 10 (12):883 - 890 (1991)
The Valdez Principles have been formulated to guide and evaluate corporate conduct towards the environment. While at first glance the code appears to impose enormous new responsibilities on firms, a closer analysis indicates that existing regulations and business practices already require businesses to meet many of the environmental goals sought by its proponents. Likely corporate response to the code is examined against this background and with reference to the experience with other voluntary codes of conduct. It would appear that compliance with the code will yield minimal benefits and non-compliance will impose minimum costs for the environmentally-responsible firm.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Rajib N. Sanyal & Joao S. Neves (1991). Complying with Voluntary Codes of Conduct: Corporate Strategies for the Valdez Principles. International Journal of Value-Based Management 4 (1):9-23.
D. Reid Weedon Jr (1986). The Evolution of Sullivan Principle Compliance. Business and Society Review 57:56-60.
Citations of this work BETA
Moses L. Pava & Joshua Krausz (1996). The Association Between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (3):321 - 357.
Similar books and articles
Linda M. Sama (2006). Interactive Effects of External Environmental Conditions and Internal Firm Characteristics on Mnes' Choice of Strategy in the Development of a Code of Conduct. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (2):137-166.
Reggy Hooghiemstra (2000). Corporate Communication and Impression Management – New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):55 - 68.
Muel Kaptein (2004). Business codes of multinational firms: What do they say? Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1):13-31.
Wayne Norman (2011). Business Ethics as Self-Regulation: Why Principles That Ground Regulations Should Be Used to Ground Beyond-Compliance Norms as Well. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):43-57.
Rafik Z. Elias (2004). An Examination of Business Students' Perception of Corporate Social Responsibilities Before and After Bankruptcies. Journal of Business Ethics 52 (3):267-281.
Bryan W. Husted (2005). Risk Management, Real Options, Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 60 (2):175 - 183.
Sybille Sachs & Marc Maurer (2009). Toward Dynamic Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility: From Corporate Social Responsibility Toward a Comprehensive and Dynamic View of Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):535 - 544.
Kenneth D. Butterfield (1996). The Influence of Collegiate and Corporate Codes of Conduct on Ethics-Related Behavior in the Workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (4):461-476.
Andreas Rasche (2010). The Limits of Corporate Responsibility Standards. Business Ethics 19 (3):280-291.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #153,723 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #99,332 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?