David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (2):104-117 (2004)
The shift from a welfarist to a retributivist perspective on crime, which is one of the themes of David Garland?s book, has brought with it a renewed emphasis on the victims of crime and their rights. This shift in emphasis, I suggest, raises questions about the way we think of the relationship between individual citizens and between citizens and the state. Different political theories will produce different accounts of this relationship and hence different ways of characterising the status and role of victims in the criminal process. In this paper then I sketch a roughly communitarian view of the citizen relationship as a context for an account of the status of victims. Thus, I argue, we need to consider not just the expectations that victims rightly have that they have rights which should to be recognised in the criminal process but also their duties as participants. Duties which require them to bear witness in calling offenders to account. This gives victims an active role in the criminal process but one that may come at a price since it might require victims to be subjected to greater scrutiny in the process of a criminal trial than they might find bearable
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Charles Taylor (2003). Cross-Purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University
Citations of this work BETA
Claes Lernestedt (2014). Victim and Society: Sharing Wrongs, but in Which Roles? [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):187-203.
R. A. Duff & S. E. Marshall (2004). Communicative Punishment and the Role of the Victim. Criminal Justice Ethics 23 (2):39-50.
Similar books and articles
Loraine Gelsthorpe (2004). Back to Basics in Crime Control: Weaving in Women. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (2):76-103.
Christopher Ciocchetti (2004). Punishment, Reintegration, and Atypical Victims. Criminal Justice Ethics 23 (2):25-38.
Yvonne McDermott, Some Are More Equal Than Others: Victim Participation in the International Criminal Court.
Tyrone Kirchengast, Recent Developments in Victim Agency in the New South Wales Justice System: The Case of Victim Impact Statements.
Christopher Bennett (2012). Vera Bergelson: Victims' Rights and Victims' Wrongs. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (1):103-109.
Robert Weisberg (1995). Review Essay / Victims' Rights in Criminal Trials. Criminal Justice Ethics 14 (2):56-62.
Martin Wright (1996). Justice for Victims and Offenders: A Restorative Response to Crime. Waterside Press.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads8 ( #470,950 of 1,932,526 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,270 of 1,932,526 )
How can I increase my downloads?