Hypatia 17 (3):214 - 224 (2002)
|Abstract||This is a selective reading of Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. My aim is twofold: to continue Love Labor's focus on dependency work and relations, adding certain distinctions and questions of my own; and to recognize the conjunction of three perspectives-theoretical, social/political, and personal-that strengthen this focus. I scant particulars of argument and ignore certain issues in the hope of providing a vivid outline of the rewards and demands of dependency as Eva Kittay envisions them|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stanley Hauerwas (2001). The Hauerwas Reader. Duke University Press.
Anca Gheaus (2005). Review of Eva Feder Kittay Love's Labor. [REVIEW] The Romanian Journal of Society and Politics 5 (1):173-7.
Eva Feder Kittay (1995). Taking Dependency Seriously: The Family and Medical Leave Act Considered in Light of the Social Organization of Dependency Work and Gender Equality. Hypatia 10 (1):8 - 29.
Shiloh Y. Whitney (2011). Dependency Relations: Corporeal Vulnerability and Norms of Personhood in Hobbes and Kittay. Hypatia 26 (3):554-574.
Martha Nussbaum (2002). Introduction to the Symposium on Eva Kittay's Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. Hypatia 17 (3):194-199.
Rosemarie Tong (2002). Love's Labor in the Health Care System: Working Toward Gender Equity. Hypatia 17 (3):200 - 213.
Eva Kittay (2002). Love's Labor Revisited. Hypatia 17 (3):237 - 250.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads13 ( #95,467 of 722,704 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,704 )
How can I increase my downloads?