Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 140 (1):117 - 133 (2008)
|Abstract||I argue that, according to ordinary morality, there is moral inertia, that is, moral pressure to fail to intervene in certain circumstances. Moral inertia is manifested in scenarios with a particular causal structure: deflection scenarios, where a threatening or benefiting process is diverted from a group of people to another. I explain why the deflection structure is essential for moral inertia to be manifested. I argue that there are two different manifestations of moral inertia: strict prohibitions on interventions, and constraints on interventions. Finally, I discuss the connection between moral inertia and the distinction between killing and letting die (or doing and allowing harm).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edward Feser (2011). Existential Inertia and the Five Ways. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2):237-267.
Beryl E. Clotfelter (1970). Reference Systems and Inertia. Ames,Iowa State University Press.
Alexander Afriat & Ermenegildo Caccese (2010). The Relativity of Inertia and Reality of Nothing. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (1):9-26.
Mary Maxwell (1992). Moral Inertia. Zygon 27 (1):51-64.
John Beaudoin (2007). The World's Continuance: Divine Conservation or Existential Inertia? [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):83 - 98.
Jason Zimba (2008). Inertia and Determinism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):417-428.
Neil C. Manson (2009). Epistemic Inertia and Epistemic Isolationism: A Response to Buchanan. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):291-298.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #43,464 of 739,336 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,187 of 739,336 )
How can I increase my downloads?