Philosophers' Imprint 10 (9) (2010)
|Abstract||Moral philosophers of late have been examining the implications of experimental social psychology for ethics. The focus of attention has been on situationism—the thesis that we routinely underestimate the extent to which minor situational variables influence morally significant behavior. Situationism has been seen as a threat to prevailing lay and philosophical theories of character, personhood, and agency. In this paper, I outline the situationist literature and critique one of its upshots: the admonition to carefully select one’s situational contexts. Besides being limited in application, this strategy accentuates an untenable person/situation dichotomy. The deeper lesson of situationism lies in highlighting the interconnectedness of all social behavior—how we are inextricably involved in the actions of others, and how minor tweaks in our own behavior can lead to major payoffs in our moral lives. Situationism is better seen as an opportunity for moral progress than a threat to individual autonomy|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Deborah S. Mower (2013). Situationism and Confucian Virtue Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):113-137.
Deborah S. Mower (2010). Scripting Situations in Moral Education. Teaching Ethics 11 (1):93-106.
Matthew Talbert (2009). Situationism, Normative Competence, and Responsibility for Wartime Behavior. Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (3):415-432.
Manuel Vargas (forthcoming). Situationism and Moral Responsibility: Free Will in Fragments. In Tillman Vierkant, Julian Kiverstein & Andy Clark (eds.), Decomposing the Will. Oxford UP.
Gopal Sreenivasan (2002). Errors About Errors: Virtue Theory and Trait Attribution. Mind 111 (441):47-68.
Christian Miller (2014). Character and Moral Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Eddy Nahmias (2007). Autonomous Agency and the Threat of Social Psychology. In M. Marraffa, M. Caro & F. Ferretti (eds.), Cartographies of the Mind: Philosophy and Psychology in Intersection. Springer.
Dana K. Nelkin (2005). Freedom, Responsibility and the Challenge of Situationism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):181–206.
Markus E. Schlosser (2013). Conscious Will, Reason-Responsiveness, and Moral Responsibility. Journal of Ethics 17 (3):205-232.
Michelle Ciurria (2013). Situationism, Moral Responsibility and Blame. Philosophia 41 (1):179-193.
Glen Koehn (2008). Character, Situation and Intelligence. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:245-260.
Matthew P. Pamental (2010). Dewey, Situationism, and Moral Education. Educational Theory 60 (2):147-166.
Candace L. Upton (2009). Virtue Ethics and Moral Psychology: The Situationism Debate. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 13 (2-3):103 - 115.
Kevin Timpe, Moral Character. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Chris Tucker (2005). Harman Vs. Virtue Theory. Southwest Philosophy Review 21 (1):137-145.
Added to index2010-12-29
Total downloads27 ( #51,617 of 722,750 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,750 )
How can I increase my downloads?