Graduate studies at Western
Kant-Studien 96 (1):1-19 (2005)
|Abstract||It is well known that the modern atomists assumed the ancient thesis that things are composed of simple entities. It is also known that Leibniz went beyond atomism, since he affirmed that the true substances on which things are founded, the so-called monads, cannot be divisible or extended, for they are souls. For Christian Wolff, the elements of bodies are not extended; these elements have no figure and no magnitude whatsoever, they fill no space and are indivisible. In the Monadologia physica, published in 1756, Kant also argues that the ultimate principles of bodies are the monads or simple substances. The goal of this work is to reconcile the confronted positions of “metaphysics” and “geometry”.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rebecca J. Lloyd (2008). Situating Time in the Leibnizian Hierarchy of Beings. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):245-260.
Daniel Garber (2009). Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. Oxford University Press.
Antonio-Maria Nunziante & Alberto Vanzo (2009). Representing Subjects, Mind-Dependent Objects: Kant, Leibniz, and the Amphiboly. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):133-151.
Shane Duarte (2009). Leibniz and the Fardella Memo. Studia Leibnitiana 41 (1):67-87.
Andree Hahmann (2009). Die Reaktion der Spekulativen Weltweisheit: Kant Und Die Kritik an den Einfachen Substanzen. Kant-Studien 100 (4):454-475.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #60,206 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?