David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (9):926-941 (2012)
Dialogic or dialogical education is an umbrella term that encompasses a myriad of different and at times conflicting approaches. As there is no agreed-upon definition of ‘dialogue’ (not that there is or should be one unified definition), and even fewer clear and systematic guidelines for application, researchers and practitioners in the DE field are faced with countless questions and dilemmas. My aim in this paper is therefore to offer some ideas for a general outline of how to employ systematic thinking on DE. This outline can serve as a basis for the development of a methodological tool that can enable researchers and practitioners to think about and apply dialogical practices with greater clarity, coherency and consistency. Following a normatively oriented (rather than instrumental) systematic line of reasoning, this paper will begin by discussing the basic values of three central dialogical approaches and then move on to discuss more practical parameters that surpass strictly pedagogical and didactic concerns
|Keywords||deconstruction Habermas Dialogic Education Socratic Dialogue dialogical values systematic thinking|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jürgen Habermas (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Polity.
David M. Rasmussen, Jurgen Habermas, Christian Lenhardt & Shierry Weber Nicholsen (1993). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):571.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marie-France Daniel, Louise Lafortune & Pierre Mongeau (2003). The Development of Dialogical Critical Thinking in Children. Inquiry 22 (4):43-55.
Antonia Larraín & Andrés Haye (2012). The Role of Rhetoric in a Dialogical Approach to Thinking. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (2):220-237.
Abraham Rudnick (2002). The Ground of Dialogical Bioethics. Health Care Analysis 10 (4):391-402.
Patrick Blackburn (2001). Modal Logic as Dialogical Logic. Synthese 127 (1-2):57 - 93.
Christopher Johns (2013). Becoming a Reflective Practitioner. John Wiley & Sons.
Robert van Es & Tiemo L. Meijlink (2000). The Dialogical Turn of Public Relation Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):69-77.
Elizabeth A. Hoppe (2011). How to Persuade Those Who Will Not Listen. Clr James Journal 17 (1):58-74.
Hugh Williams (2010). The Problem of Realism in the Philosophy of Charles Taylor and an Existential Thomist Proposal. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):93-115.
Maurice A. Finocchiaro (2005). Arguments About Arguments: Systematic, Critical, and Historical Essays in Logical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Beata Stawarska (2008). Feeling Good Vibrations in Dialogical Relations. Continental Philosophy Review 41 (2):217-236.
John Rowan (2010). Personification: Using the Dialogical Self in Psychotherapy and Counselling. Routledge.
Matthew Sanger & Richard Osguthorpe (2005). Making Sense of Approaches to Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 34 (1):57-71.
Guy Widdershoven, Tineke Abma & Bert Molewijk (2009). Empirical Ethics as Dialogical Practice. Bioethics 23 (4):236-248.
A. M. Sidorkin (1999). The Fine Art of Sitting on Two Stools: Multicultural Education Between Postmodernism and Critical Theory. Studies in Philosophy and Education 18 (3):143-156.
Added to index2011-05-26
Total downloads10 ( #347,727 of 1,911,757 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,113 of 1,911,757 )
How can I increase my downloads?