Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy 83 (2):231-253 (2008)
|Abstract||This paper looks at two accounts of Aristotle's views on the virtue of megalopsychia. The first, defended by Christopher Cordner, commits Aristotle to two claims about the virtuous person that might seem unpalatable to modern readers. The second account, defended by Roger Crips, does not commit Aristotle to these claims. Some might count this as an advantage of Crisp's account. However, I argue that Cordner's account, not Crisp's, is actually the better interpretation of Aristotle. Nonetheless, this does not ultimately spell trouble for Aristotle, since, as I argue, the claims that Cordner's account commits Aristotle to are, on closer inspection, not really problematic|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Garrett Michael Cullity (2003). Asking Too Much. The Monist 86 (3):402-418.
Garrett Cullity (2003). Asking Too Much. The Monist 86 (3):402 - 418.
Garrett Cullity (2008). Public Goods and Fairness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (1):1 – 21.
Alan Strudler (2010). The Distinctive Wrong in Lying. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2):171 - 179.
Ori J. Herstein (2012). Defending the Right To Do Wrong. Law and Philosophy 31 (3):343-365.
Charles Fried (1978). Right and Wrong. Harvard University Press.
Christopher Steinsvold (2010). Being Wrong: Logics for False Belief. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (3):245-253.
Kristján Kristjánsson (1998). Liberating Moral Traditions: Saga Morality and Aristotle's Megalopsychia. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (4):397-422.
Ronald Polansky (2003). Moral Virtue and Megalopsychia. Ancient Philosophy 23 (2):351-359.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #42,031 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?