Reichsrundschreiben 1931: Pre-nuremberg German regulations concerning new therapy and human experimentation
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (2):99-112 (1983)
This is the first re-publication and first English translation of regulations concerning Human Experimentation which were binding law prior to and during the Third Reich, 1931 to 1945. The introduction briefly describes the duties of the Reichsgesundheitsamt, which formulated these regulations. It then outlines the basic concept of the Richtlinien for protecting subjects and patients on the one hand and for encouraging New Therapy and Human Experimentation on the other hand. Major issues, like personal responsibility of the physician or researcher, teaching of ethics of research and therapy, and research and therapy on vulnerable populations, are compared with the regulations in the Nuremberg Code and subsequent regulations influenced by the Nuremberg Code. CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Stuart G. Finder (2004). Vulnerability in Human Subject Research: Existential State, Not Category Designation. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):68-70.
Eva Hedfors (2007). Medical Ethics in the Wake of the Holocaust: Departing From a Postwar Paper by Ludwik Fleck. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (3):642-655.
Eva Hedfors (2007). Medical Ethics in the Wake of the Holocaust: Departing From a Postwar Paper by Ludwik Fleck. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (3):642-655.
Similar books and articles
Bradford H. Gray (1981). Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation: A Sociological Study of the Conduct and Regulation of Clinical Research. R.E. Krieger Pub. Co..
Robert Schulte & Mary Dluhy (2012). A Playful Approach to Group Therapy Education. In Irene N. H. Harwood, Walter Stone & Malcolm Pines (eds.), Self Experiences in Group, Revisited: Affective Attachments, Intersubjective Regulations, and Human Understanding. Routledge
Paul M. McNeill (1993). The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation. Cambridge University Press.
Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming (2011). New Rules for Research with Human Participants? Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
David Resnik (1994). Debunking the Slippery Slope Argument Against Human Germ-Line Gene Therapy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):23-40.
Kathleen Nolan (1991). Commentary: How Do We Think About the Ethics of Human Germ-Line Genetic Therapy? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):613-619.
C. G. Foster (1995). The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (4):247-247.
Added to index2010-08-14
Total downloads32 ( #119,134 of 1,790,148 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #123,151 of 1,790,148 )
How can I increase my downloads?