Scanning the “Fringe” of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 18 (3):608-618 (2009)
In intuitions concerning semantic coherence participants are able to discriminate above chance whether a word triad has a common remote associate or not . These intuitions are driven by increased fluency in processing coherent triads compared to incoherent triads, which in turn triggers a brief and short positive affect. The present work investigates which of these internal cues, fluency or positive affect, is the actual cue underlying coherence intuitions. In Experiment 1, participants liked coherent word triads more than incoherent triads, but did not rate them as being more fluent in processing. In Experiment 2, participants could intuitively detect coherence when they misattributed fluency to an external source, but lost this intuitive ability when they misattributed affect. It is concluded that the coherence-induced fluency by itself is not consciously experienced and not used in the coherence intuitions, but the fluency-triggered affective consequences
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bernard J. Baars & Katharine A. McGovern (1996). Cognitive Views of Consciousness: What Are the Facts? How Can We Explain Them? In Max Velmans (ed.), The Science of Consciousness. Routledge.
John A. Bargh (1994). The Four Horsemen of Automaticity: Awareness, Intention, Efficiency, and Control in Social Cognition. In R. Wyer & T. Srull (eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
S. Brown (2000). Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomena: An Introductory Phenomenological Analysis. Consciousness and Cognition 9 (4):516-537.
Gerald L. Clore (1992). Cognitive Phenomenology: Feelings and the Construction of Judgment. In L. Martin & A. Tesser (eds.), The Construction of Social Judgments. Lawrence Erlbaum. 10--133.
N. D. Cook (1999). Simulating Consciousness in a Bilateral Neural Network: ''Nuclear'' and ''Fringe'' Awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (1):62-93.
Citations of this work BETA
Valerie Thompson & Kinga Morsanyi (2012). Analytic Thinking: Do You Feel Like It? Mind and Society 11 (1):93-105.
Sascha Topolinski & Fritz Strack (2009). The Analysis of Intuition: Processing Fluency and Affect in Judgements of Semantic Coherence. Cognition and Emotion 23 (8):1465-1503.
Kevin A. Smith, David E. Huber & Edward Vul (2013). Multiply-Constrained Semantic Search in the Remote Associates Test. Cognition 128 (1):64-75.
Koen A. Dijkstra, Joop van der Pligt & Gerben A. van Kleef (forthcoming). Effects of Processing Style on Responsiveness to Affective Stimuli and Processing Fluency. Cognition and Emotion:1-12.
Sascha Topolinski (2014). A Processing Fluency-Account of Funniness: Running Gags and Spoiling Punchlines. Cognition and Emotion 28 (5):811-820.
Similar books and articles
Eric Dietrich & Valerie Gray Hardcastle (2002). A Connecticut Yalie in King Descartes' Court. Newsletter of Cognitive Science Society (Now Defunct).
Joe Becker (2004). Reconsidering the Role of Overcoming Perturbations in Cognitive Development: Constructivism and Consicousness. Human Development 47 (2):77-93.
Igor Douven & Wouter Meijs (2007). Measuring Coherence. Synthese 156 (3):405 - 425.
Stevan Harnad (2001). Editorial Commentary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):973-974.
Bruce Mangan (2007). Cognition, Fringe Consciousness, and the Legacy of William James. In Max Velmans & Susan Schneider (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Blackwell. 671--685.
Russell Epstein (2000). The Neural-Cognitive Basis of the Jamesian Stream of Thought. Consciousness and Cognition 9 (4):550-575.
T. Nielsen (2007). Felt Presence: Paranoid Delusion or Hallucinatory Social Imagery?☆. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (4):975-983.
J. Allancheyne & T. Girard (2007). The Nature and Varieties of Felt Presence Experiences: A Reply to Nielsen☆. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (4):984-991.
John Schwenkler (2012). On the Matching of Seen and Felt Shape by Newly Sighted Subjects. I-Perception 3 (3):186-188.
Christopher Mole, Corey Kubatzky, Jan Plate, Rawdon Waller, Marilee Dobbs & Marc Nardone (2007). Faces and Brains: The Limitations of Brain Scanning in Cognitive Science. Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):197 – 207.
Kent Bach (2002). Seemingly Semantic Intuitions. In Joseph K. Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and Truth - Investigations in Philosophical Semantics. Seven Bridges Press. 21--33.
Kirsten G. Volz, Lael J. Schooler & D. Yves von Cramon (2010). It Just Felt Right: The Neural Correlates of the Fluency Heuristic☆. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (3):829-837.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads21 ( #119,065 of 1,696,590 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #187,594 of 1,696,590 )
How can I increase my downloads?