David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Law and Ethics of Human Rights 3 (1):87-109 (2009)
This paper considers the normative assessment of bonded labor from the perspectives of libertarianism and Paretian welfare economics. I argue that neither theory can account for our objections to bonded labor arrangements; moreover, they fail in interesting ways. Reflecting on their normative failures focuses us on other considerations besides individual choice and efficiency. Such considerations include: the effects of labor markets on workers' preferences and capacities; the exploitation of the vulnerabilities of the poor; and the permanent binding of one person to another
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Danny Frederick (forthcoming). The Possibility of Contractual Slavery. Philosophical Quarterly:pqv052.
Similar books and articles
Danny Frederick (2010). A Competitive Market in Human Organs. Libertarian Papers 2 (27):1-21.
Maurice S. Lee (2005). Slavery, Philosophy, and American Literature, 1830-1860. Cambridge University Press.
Virginia Held (2002). Care and the Extension of Markets. Hypatia 17 (2):19-33.
Thomas May (1999). Response to “Advance Directives and Voluntary Slavery” by Christopher Tollefsen (CQ Vol 7, No 4). Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (03):358-363.
Richard Bellamy (1994). Moralizing Markets. Critical Review 8 (3):341-357.
Simon Roberts-Thomson (2008). An Explanation of the Injustice of Slavery. Res Publica 14 (2):69-82.
Lynn A. Jansen (2004). No Safe Harbor: The Principle of Complicity and the Practice of Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (1):61 – 74.
David Ellerman (2010). Inalienable Rights: A Litmus Test for Liberal Theories of Justice. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 29 (Sept.):571-599.
Ariela J. Gross, When is the Time of Slavery? The History and Politics of Slavery in Contemporary Legal Argument.
Jane Duran (2010). Slavery in Global Context. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):61-69.
Debra Satz (2007). Liberalism, Economic Freedom, and the Limits of Markets. Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):120-140.
Christopher Tollefsen (1998). Response to “Reassessing the Reliability of Advance Directives” by Thomas May (CQ Vol. 6, No. 5) Advance Directives and Voluntary Slavery. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):405-413.
Uskali Mäki (1999). Science as a Free Market: A Reflexivity Test in an Economics of Economics. Perspectives on Science 7 (4):486-509.
Jeffrey Friedman (2000). After Democracy, Bureaucracy? Rejoinder to Ciepley. Critical Review 14 (1):113-137.
Alistair M. Macleod (2011). The Voluntary Transactions Principle and the Free Market Ideal. Social Philosophy Today 27:31-46.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads65 ( #50,098 of 1,724,892 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #210,938 of 1,724,892 )
How can I increase my downloads?