Graduate studies at Western
OUP USA (2010)
|Abstract||What's wrong with markets in everything? Markets today are widely recognized as the most efficient way in general to organize production and distribution in a complex economy. And with the collapse of communism and rise of globalization, it's no surprise that markets and the political theories supporting them have seen a considerable resurgence. For many, markets are an all-purpose remedy for the deadening effects of bureaucracy and state control. But what about those markets we might label noxious-markets in addictive drugs, say, or in sex, weapons, child labor, or human organs? Such markets arouse widespread discomfort and often revulsion. In Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale, philosopher Debra Satz takes a penetrating look at those commodity exchanges that strike most of us as problematic. What considerations, she asks, ought to guide the debates about such markets? What is it about a market involving prostitution or the sale of kidneys that makes it morally objectionable? How is a market in weapons or pollution different than a market in soybeans or automobiles? Are laws and social policies banning the more noxious markets necessarily the best responses to them? Satz contends that categories previously used by philosophers and economists are of limited utility in addressing such questions because they have assumed markets to be homogenous. Accordingly, she offers a broader and more nuanced view of markets-one that goes beyond the usual discussions of efficiency and distributional equality--to show how markets shape our culture, foster or thwart human development, and create and support structures of power. An accessibly written work that will engage not only philosophers but also political scientists, economists, legal scholars, and public policy experts, this book is a significant contribution to ongoing discussions about the place of markets in a democratic society.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$14.29 used (81% off) $23.04 new (69% off) $51.63 direct from Amazon (31% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Debra Satz (2008). The Moral Limits of Markets: The Case of Human Kidneys. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):269-288.
Debra Satz (2007). Liberalism, Economic Freedom, and the Limits of Markets. Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):120-140.
David Schmidtz (2011). Debra Satz: Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets. Journal of Philosophy 108 (4).
Daniel M. Hausman (1989). Are Markets Morally Free Zones? Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (4):317-333.
Karl Reinhard Kolmsee (2000). Philosophy at the Core of Economic Markets. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (4):75-78.
W. Paul Cockshott & Allin F. Cottrell (1997). Value, Markets and Socialism. Science and Society 61 (3):330 - 357.
James Stacey Taylor (2006). Why Markets in Proto-Deceptive Goods Should Be Restricted. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (4):325 - 335.
William Kline (2010). Do No Harm: A Defense of Markets in Healthcare. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 22 (3):241-251.
James Tooley (1995). Markets or Democracy for Education? A Reply to Stewart Ranson. British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (1):21 - 34.
Robert S. Taylor (2007). Self-Ownership and Transplantable Human Organs. Public Affairs Quarterly 21 (1):89-107.
Oliver Budzinski & Nadine Lindstädt, New Developments in Media Economics: The Concept of Multisided Markets (Neuere Entwicklungen in der Medienökonomik: Das Konzept der Mehrseitigen Märkte).
Robert E. Goodin (2006). Volenti Goes to Market. Journal of Ethics 10 (1-2):53 - 74.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads33 ( #42,047 of 738,458 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,458 )
How can I increase my downloads?