Analysis 66 (289):52–63 (2006)
|Abstract||Particle indistinguishability has always been considered a purely quantum mechanical concept. In parallel, indistinguishable particles have been thought to be entities that are not properly speaking objects at all. I argue, to the contrary, that the concept can equally be applied to classical particles, and that in either case particles may (with certain exceptions) be counted as objects even though they are indistinguishable. The exceptions are elementary bosons (for example photons).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andreas Bartels (1999). Objects or Events?: Towards an Ontology for Quantum Field Theory. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):184.
Dennis Dieks (1990). Quantum Statistics, Identical Particles and Correlations. Synthese 82 (1):127 - 155.
Robert C. Hilborn & Candice L. Yuca (2002). Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics Revisited. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (3):355-389.
Steven French & Décio Krause (2003). Quantum Vagueness. Erkenntnis 59 (1):97 - 124.
Tobias Fox (2008). Haunted by the Spectre of Virtual Particles: A Philosophical Reconsideration. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 39 (1):35 - 51.
Dennis Dieks & Marijn Versteegh (2008). Identical Quantum Particles and Weak Discernibility. Foundations of Physics 38 (10):923-934.
Matteo Morganti (2011). Identity in Physics: Statistics and the (Non-)Individuality of Quantum Particles. In H. De Regt, S. Hartmann & S.: Okasha (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #41,965 of 722,933 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #13,420 of 722,933 )
How can I increase my downloads?